vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EXPONENT INC (EXPO) and UP Fintech Holding Ltd (TIGR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EXPONENT INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($166.3M vs $107.6M, roughly 1.5× UP Fintech Holding Ltd). UP Fintech Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs 17.8%, a 10.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Exponent, Inc. is an American engineering and scientific consulting firm. Exponent has a team of scientists, physicians, engineers, and business consultants which performs research and analysis in more than 90 technical disciplines. The company operates 20 offices in the United States and five offices overseas.
UP Fintech Holding Limited, operating under the Tiger Brokers brand, provides online financial services for global Chinese investors. It offers cross-market stock trading (US, Hong Kong, mainland China A-shares), fund management, margin financing and investor education for retail and institutional clients.
EXPO vs TIGR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2027 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $166.3M | $107.6M |
| Net Profit | $29.6M | $30.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.8% | 28.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 11.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.59 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $147.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.8M | $107.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.5M | $166.4M |
| Q1 26 | $29.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.6M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $15.2M |
| Q1 26 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.2% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.59 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $118.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $687.4M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $118.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $207.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $245.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.3M | $392.5M |
| Q1 26 | $338.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $402.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $427.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $441.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $410.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.2M | $501.2M |
| Q1 26 | $687.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $761.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $759.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $763.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $777.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $744.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $709.2M | $4.8B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXPO
| Revenues before reimbursements | $151.8M | 91% |
| Reimbursements | $14.5M | 9% |
TIGR
Segment breakdown not available.
