vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EXPONENT INC (EXPO) and TOYO Co., Ltd (TOYO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EXPONENT INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($166.3M vs $139.1M, roughly 1.2× TOYO Co., Ltd). EXPONENT INC runs the higher net margin — 17.8% vs 2.5%, a 15.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EXPONENT INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 0.7%).
Exponent, Inc. is an American engineering and scientific consulting firm. Exponent has a team of scientists, physicians, engineers, and business consultants which performs research and analysis in more than 90 technical disciplines. The company operates 20 offices in the United States and five offices overseas.
Toyo Tire Corporation , commonly known as Toyo Tires, is a multinational tire and rubber products company based in Itami, Japan. The company owns and operates eight factories in Asia, North America, and Europe and distributes tires and automotive components through fourteen sales companies throughout the world.
EXPO vs TOYO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2027 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $166.3M | $139.1M |
| Net Profit | $29.6M | $3.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 16.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.9% | 7.0% |
| Net Margin | 17.8% | 2.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | 0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 11.0% | -82.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.59 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $147.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.5M | $139.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.5M | $138.1M |
| Q1 26 | $29.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $19.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.3% |
| Q1 26 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 16.3% |
| Q1 26 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 14.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.59 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $118.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $13.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.3M | $67.0M |
| Total Assets | $687.4M | $353.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.20× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $118.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $207.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $245.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.4M |
| Q1 26 | $338.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $402.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $427.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $441.4M | $67.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $410.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.2M | $73.4M |
| Q1 26 | $687.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $761.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $759.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $763.2M | $353.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $777.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $744.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $709.2M | $241.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.31× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $40.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-7.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 33.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 11.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3M | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | $21.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.2M | $5.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 12.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.27× | 11.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.65× | 1.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXPO
| Revenues before reimbursements | $151.8M | 91% |
| Reimbursements | $14.5M | 9% |
TOYO
Segment breakdown not available.
