vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EZCORP INC (EZPW) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EZCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($382.0M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.4× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). EZCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 11.6% vs 0.7%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EZCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.3% vs -16.5%). EZCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.7M vs $3.4M).
EZCORP, Inc. is an American pawn shop operator based in Austin, Texas which provides services across the United States and Latin America. It is a publicly traded company listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange and is the second largest pawn shop operator in the U.S. after Cash America International.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
EZPW vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $382.0M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $44.3M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 58.4% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.9% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 11.6% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.3% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 42.8% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $382.0M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.0M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.3M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $320.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $294.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $281.4M | $305.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $285.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.5M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.9M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 58.4% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.3% | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.5% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.34 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.29 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $465.9M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $518.6M | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $465.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $469.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $472.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $505.2M | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $174.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.0M | $802.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $229.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $518.6M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $518.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $517.6M | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $620.5M | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $327.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $361.3M | $82.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $360.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $990.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $851.6M | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $823.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $801.5M | $740.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $800.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.45× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $39.1M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.7M | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.3% | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $121.7M | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $39.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.8M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.9M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.7M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $31.7M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7M | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.6M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.5M | $-49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.88× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.45× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.85× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.70× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EZPW
| Merchandise | $210.1M | 55% |
| Pawn Service | $131.9M | 35% |
| Jewelry Scrap | $39.9M | 10% |
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.