vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EZCORP INC (EZPW) and Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EZCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($382.0M vs $219.1M, roughly 1.7× Iridium Communications Inc.). EZCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 11.6% vs 9.9%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EZCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.3% vs 1.9%). Over the past eight quarters, EZCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (15.6% CAGR vs 4.4%).
EZCORP, Inc. is an American pawn shop operator based in Austin, Texas which provides services across the United States and Latin America. It is a publicly traded company listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange and is the second largest pawn shop operator in the U.S. after Cash America International.
Iridium Communications Inc. is a publicly traded American company headquartered in McLean, Virginia, United States. Iridium operates the Iridium satellite constellation, a system of 80 satellites: 66 are active satellites and the remaining fourteen function as in-orbit spares. Iridium Satellites are used for worldwide voice and data communication from handheld satellite phones, satellite messenger communication devices and integrated transceivers, as well as for two-way satellite messaging se...
EZPW vs IRDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $382.0M | $219.1M |
| Net Profit | $44.3M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | 58.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.9% | 23.2% |
| Net Margin | 11.6% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.3% | 1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 42.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $219.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $382.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.8M | $226.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.0M | $216.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.3M | $214.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $320.2M | $213.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $294.6M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $281.4M | $201.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.7M | $37.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.5M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.2M | $24.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.9M | $32.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 21.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.34 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $465.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $518.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | — |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $465.9M | $96.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $469.5M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $472.1M | $79.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $505.2M | $50.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $174.5M | $93.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.5M | $159.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.0M | $63.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $518.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $518.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $517.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $620.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $327.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $361.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $462.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $450.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $990.1M | $473.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $851.6M | $518.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $823.9M | $576.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | $663.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $801.5M | $786.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | 3.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 3.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $39.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 13.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $121.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $39.1M | $108.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.3M | $100.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.8M | $129.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.9M | $61.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | $104.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3M | $118.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.7M | $81.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.7M | $75.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | $79.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.6M | $36.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.4M | $80.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | $100.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.5M | $68.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | 35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 34.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.88× | 4.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.92× | 2.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | 5.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.45× | 2.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.84× | 2.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.85× | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 2.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EZPW
| Merchandise | $210.1M | 55% |
| Pawn Service | $131.9M | 35% |
| Jewelry Scrap | $39.9M | 10% |
IRDM
| Voice and data | $57.4M | 26% |
| IoT data (2) | $46.0M | 21% |
| Government | $39.5M | 18% |
| Government service revenue (5) | $27.6M | 13% |
| Subscriber equipment | $20.2M | 9% |
| Hosted payload and other data service (4) | $14.8M | 7% |
| Broadband (3) | $12.2M | 6% |
| Commercial | $1.3M | 1% |
