vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EZCORP INC (EZPW) and LAMAR ADVERTISING CO (LAMR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LAMAR ADVERTISING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($528.0M vs $382.0M, roughly 1.4× EZCORP INC). LAMAR ADVERTISING CO runs the higher net margin — 19.3% vs 11.6%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EZCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.3% vs 4.5%). LAMAR ADVERTISING CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($152.3M vs $31.7M). Over the past eight quarters, EZCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (15.6% CAGR vs -3.4%).

EZCORP, Inc. is an American pawn shop operator based in Austin, Texas which provides services across the United States and Latin America. It is a publicly traded company listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange and is the second largest pawn shop operator in the U.S. after Cash America International.

Lamar Advertising Company is an advertising company which operates billboards, logo signs, and transit displays in the United States and Canada. The company was founded in 1902 by Charles W. Lamar and J.M. Coe, and is headquartered in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The company has over 200 locations in the United States and Canada. They have reportedly more than 363,000 displays across the USA. Lamar Advertising Company became a real estate investment trust in 2014.

EZPW vs LAMR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LAMR
LAMR
1.4× larger
LAMR
$528.0M
$382.0M
EZPW
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
EZPW
EZPW
+14.9% gap
EZPW
19.3%
4.5%
LAMR
Higher net margin
LAMR
LAMR
7.7% more per $
LAMR
19.3%
11.6%
EZPW
More free cash flow
LAMR
LAMR
$120.7M more FCF
LAMR
$152.3M
$31.7M
EZPW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EZPW
EZPW
Annualised
EZPW
15.6%
-3.4%
LAMR

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Revenue
$382.0M
$528.0M
Net Profit
$44.3M
$101.8M
Gross Margin
58.4%
Operating Margin
15.9%
27.7%
Net Margin
11.6%
19.3%
Revenue YoY
19.3%
4.5%
Net Profit YoY
42.8%
-26.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.55
$1.00

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
$528.0M
Q4 25
$382.0M
$595.9M
Q3 25
$336.8M
$585.5M
Q2 25
$311.0M
$579.3M
Q1 25
$306.3M
$505.4M
Q4 24
$320.2M
$579.6M
Q3 24
$294.6M
$564.1M
Q2 24
$281.4M
$565.3M
Net Profit
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
$101.8M
Q4 25
$44.3M
$152.3M
Q3 25
$26.7M
$141.8M
Q2 25
$26.5M
$154.4M
Q1 25
$25.4M
$138.8M
Q4 24
$31.0M
$-1.2M
Q3 24
$15.2M
$147.5M
Q2 24
$17.9M
$137.4M
Gross Margin
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
Q4 25
58.4%
67.7%
Q3 25
59.0%
67.9%
Q2 25
59.1%
67.8%
Q1 25
58.3%
64.4%
Q4 24
57.9%
67.8%
Q3 24
59.5%
67.6%
Q2 24
59.2%
67.6%
Operating Margin
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
27.7%
Q4 25
15.9%
32.9%
Q3 25
11.0%
32.3%
Q2 25
11.6%
34.1%
Q1 25
11.2%
37.8%
Q4 24
13.1%
6.3%
Q3 24
8.8%
33.1%
Q2 24
7.9%
32.6%
Net Margin
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
19.3%
Q4 25
11.6%
25.6%
Q3 25
7.9%
24.2%
Q2 25
8.5%
26.6%
Q1 25
8.3%
27.5%
Q4 24
9.7%
-0.2%
Q3 24
5.2%
26.1%
Q2 24
6.4%
24.3%
EPS (diluted)
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
$1.00
Q4 25
$0.55
$1.50
Q3 25
$0.35
$1.40
Q2 25
$0.34
$1.52
Q1 25
$0.33
$1.35
Q4 24
$0.40
$-0.02
Q3 24
$0.20
$1.44
Q2 24
$0.25
$1.34

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$465.9M
$39.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$518.6M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.1B
$981.7M
Total Assets
$2.0B
$6.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.48×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
$39.3M
Q4 25
$465.9M
$64.8M
Q3 25
$469.5M
$22.0M
Q2 25
$472.1M
$55.7M
Q1 25
$505.2M
$36.1M
Q4 24
$174.5M
$49.5M
Q3 24
$170.5M
$29.5M
Q2 24
$218.0M
$77.9M
Total Debt
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$518.6M
Q3 25
$518.1M
Q2 25
$517.6M
Q1 25
$620.5M
Q4 24
$327.7M
Q3 24
$327.3M
Q2 24
$361.3M
Stockholders' Equity
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
$981.7M
Q4 25
$1.1B
$1.0B
Q3 25
$1.0B
$1.0B
Q2 25
$990.1M
$906.9M
Q1 25
$851.6M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$823.9M
$1.0B
Q3 24
$804.6M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$801.5M
$1.2B
Total Assets
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
$6.9B
Q4 25
$2.0B
$6.9B
Q3 25
$2.0B
$6.8B
Q2 25
$1.9B
$6.7B
Q1 25
$1.8B
$6.5B
Q4 24
$1.5B
$6.6B
Q3 24
$1.5B
$6.5B
Q2 24
$1.5B
$6.6B
Debt / Equity
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.48×
Q3 25
0.51×
Q2 25
0.52×
Q1 25
0.73×
Q4 24
0.40×
Q3 24
0.41×
Q2 24
0.45×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$39.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$31.7M
$152.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
8.3%
28.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.0%
6.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.88×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$121.7M
$737.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$39.1M
$271.2M
Q3 25
$51.3M
$235.7M
Q2 25
$34.8M
$229.5M
Q1 25
$36.9M
$127.7M
Q4 24
$26.0M
$279.3M
Q3 24
$43.3M
$227.4M
Q2 24
$33.7M
$256.3M
Free Cash Flow
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
$152.3M
Q4 25
$31.7M
$208.3M
Q3 25
$35.7M
$185.8M
Q2 25
$25.7M
$191.3M
Q1 25
$28.6M
$97.9M
Q4 24
$20.4M
$236.3M
Q3 24
$24.4M
$197.3M
Q2 24
$30.5M
$233.7M
FCF Margin
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
28.9%
Q4 25
8.3%
35.0%
Q3 25
10.6%
31.7%
Q2 25
8.3%
33.0%
Q1 25
9.3%
19.4%
Q4 24
6.4%
40.8%
Q3 24
8.3%
35.0%
Q2 24
10.8%
41.3%
Capex Intensity
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
6.3%
Q4 25
2.0%
10.5%
Q3 25
4.6%
8.5%
Q2 25
2.9%
6.6%
Q1 25
2.7%
5.9%
Q4 24
1.8%
7.4%
Q3 24
6.4%
5.3%
Q2 24
1.1%
4.0%
Cash Conversion
EZPW
EZPW
LAMR
LAMR
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.88×
1.78×
Q3 25
1.92×
1.66×
Q2 25
1.31×
1.49×
Q1 25
1.45×
0.92×
Q4 24
0.84×
Q3 24
2.85×
1.54×
Q2 24
1.88×
1.87×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EZPW
EZPW

Merchandise$210.1M55%
Pawn Service$131.9M35%
Jewelry Scrap$39.9M10%

LAMR
LAMR

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons