vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Diamondback Energy (FANG) and MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. (MMLP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Diamondback Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4B vs $187.7M, roughly 18.0× MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.). MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs -43.2%, a 44.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.5% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Diamondback Energy's revenue compounded faster (23.1% CAGR vs 0.8%).

Diamondback Energy, headquartered in Midland, Texas, is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Permian Basin.

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. is a U.S.-based midstream energy services provider. It offers storage, transportation, distribution and processing solutions for crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined petroleum products and specialty chemicals, mainly serving customers across North American energy and industrial segments.

FANG vs MMLP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FANG
FANG
18.0× larger
FANG
$3.4B
$187.7M
MMLP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MMLP
MMLP
+6.5% gap
MMLP
-2.5%
-9.0%
FANG
Higher net margin
MMLP
MMLP
44.9% more per $
MMLP
1.7%
-43.2%
FANG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FANG
FANG
Annualised
FANG
23.1%
0.8%
MMLP

Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026

Metric
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Revenue
$3.4B
$187.7M
Net Profit
$-1.5B
$3.2M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-82.4%
Net Margin
-43.2%
1.7%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
-2.5%
Net Profit YoY
-235.8%
132.4%
EPS (diluted)
$-4.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
$187.7M
Q4 25
$3.4B
$174.2M
Q3 25
$3.9B
$168.7M
Q2 25
$3.7B
$180.7M
Q1 25
$4.0B
$192.5M
Q4 24
$3.7B
$171.3M
Q3 24
$2.6B
$170.9M
Q2 24
$2.5B
$184.5M
Net Profit
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
$3.2M
Q4 25
$-1.5B
$-2.9M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$-8.4M
Q2 25
$699.0M
$-2.4M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$-1.0M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$-8.9M
Q3 24
$659.0M
$-3.3M
Q2 24
$837.0M
$3.8M
Gross Margin
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
57.1%
Q3 25
55.1%
Q2 25
56.5%
Q1 25
53.5%
Q4 24
58.2%
Q3 24
58.5%
Q2 24
58.4%
Operating Margin
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
-82.4%
7.3%
Q3 25
31.5%
4.1%
Q2 25
31.0%
8.2%
Q1 25
41.3%
7.5%
Q4 24
38.0%
4.0%
Q3 24
26.8%
7.4%
Q2 24
46.6%
10.8%
Net Margin
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
1.7%
Q4 25
-43.2%
-1.7%
Q3 25
25.9%
-5.0%
Q2 25
19.0%
-1.3%
Q1 25
34.7%
-0.5%
Q4 24
28.9%
-5.2%
Q3 24
24.9%
-1.9%
Q2 24
33.7%
2.0%
EPS (diluted)
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-4.99
Q3 25
$3.51
Q2 25
$2.38
Q1 25
$4.83
Q4 24
$3.40
Q3 24
$3.19
Q2 24
$4.66

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$104.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$13.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$37.0B
Total Assets
$71.1B
$537.1M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.37×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$104.0M
Q3 25
$159.0M
Q2 25
$219.0M
Q1 25
$1.8B
Q4 24
$161.0M
Q3 24
$370.0M
Q2 24
$6.9B
Total Debt
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$13.7B
$428.0M
Q3 25
$15.8B
$441.3M
Q2 25
$15.1B
$427.8M
Q1 25
$13.0B
$451.4M
Q4 24
$12.1B
$437.6M
Q3 24
$11.9B
$469.3M
Q2 24
$12.0B
$439.4M
Stockholders' Equity
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$37.0B
Q3 25
$39.1B
Q2 25
$38.9B
Q1 25
$38.5B
Q4 24
$37.7B
Q3 24
$37.4B
Q2 24
$17.4B
Total Assets
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
$537.1M
Q4 25
$71.1B
$522.4M
Q3 25
$76.2B
$510.1M
Q2 25
$71.9B
$515.6M
Q1 25
$70.1B
$533.4M
Q4 24
$67.3B
$538.5M
Q3 24
$65.7B
$554.8M
Q2 24
$35.6B
$535.1M
Debt / Equity
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.37×
Q3 25
0.41×
Q2 25
0.39×
Q1 25
0.34×
Q4 24
0.32×
Q3 24
0.32×
Q2 24
0.69×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$2.3B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-6.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-3.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$27.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.3B
$22.4M
Q3 25
$2.4B
$-1.2M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$30.9M
Q1 25
$2.4B
$-6.0M
Q4 24
$2.3B
$42.2M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$-15.8M
Q2 24
$1.5B
$11.8M
Free Cash Flow
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
$-6.0M
Q4 25
$15.6M
Q3 25
$-7.9M
Q2 25
$25.6M
Q1 25
$-11.9M
Q4 24
$34.2M
Q3 24
$-25.6M
Q2 24
$-696.0K
FCF Margin
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
-3.2%
Q4 25
8.9%
Q3 25
-4.7%
Q2 25
14.2%
Q1 25
-6.2%
Q4 24
20.0%
Q3 24
-15.0%
Q2 24
-0.4%
Capex Intensity
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
1.6%
Q4 25
3.9%
Q3 25
4.0%
Q2 25
3.0%
Q1 25
3.1%
Q4 24
4.6%
Q3 24
5.8%
Q2 24
6.8%
Cash Conversion
FANG
FANG
MMLP
MMLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
2.34×
Q2 25
2.40×
Q1 25
1.68×
Q4 24
2.18×
Q3 24
1.83×
Q2 24
1.83×
3.13×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FANG
FANG

Oil Explorationand Production$2.7B81%
Oil Purchased$308.0M9%
Natural Gas Liquids Production$293.0M9%
Natural Gas Production$4.0M0%

MMLP
MMLP

Specialty products$61.6M33%
Transportation *$52.8M28%
Other$46.5M25%
Terminalling and storage *$22.4M12%
Sulfur services$4.4M2%

Related Comparisons