vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fat Brands, Inc (FAT) and Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Fat Brands, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($140.0M vs $88.5M, roughly 1.6× Hut 8 Corp.). Fat Brands, Inc runs the higher net margin — -41.6% vs -316.0%, a 274.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hut 8 Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (179.2% vs -2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Hut 8 Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (30.8% CAGR vs -6.1%).

FAT Brands Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant and sports bar franchise operator headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.

Tropical Hut is a Filipino chain of fast food restaurants owned by Mercury Group of Companies, Inc. It is the 7th oldest food chain in the Philippines and older than Jollibee (1978) and McDonald's Philippines (1981).

FAT vs HUT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FAT
FAT
1.6× larger
FAT
$140.0M
$88.5M
HUT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
HUT
HUT
+181.6% gap
HUT
179.2%
-2.3%
FAT
Higher net margin
FAT
FAT
274.5% more per $
FAT
-41.6%
-316.0%
HUT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
HUT
HUT
Annualised
HUT
30.8%
-6.1%
FAT

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Revenue
$140.0M
$88.5M
Net Profit
$-58.2M
$-279.7M
Gross Margin
60.4%
Operating Margin
-12.4%
-491.4%
Net Margin
-41.6%
-316.0%
Revenue YoY
-2.3%
179.2%
Net Profit YoY
-30.1%
-283.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.39
$-2.45

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$88.5M
Q3 25
$140.0M
$83.5M
Q2 25
$146.8M
$41.3M
Q1 25
$142.0M
$21.8M
Q4 24
$145.3M
$31.7M
Q3 24
$143.4M
$43.7M
Q2 24
$152.0M
$35.2M
Q1 24
$152.0M
$51.7M
Net Profit
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$-279.7M
Q3 25
$-58.2M
$50.1M
Q2 25
$-54.2M
$137.3M
Q1 25
$-46.0M
$-133.9M
Q4 24
$-67.4M
$152.2M
Q3 24
$-44.8M
$647.0K
Q2 24
$-39.4M
$-71.9M
Q1 24
$-38.3M
$250.9M
Gross Margin
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
60.4%
Q3 25
61.3%
Q2 25
47.3%
Q1 25
14.5%
Q4 24
35.9%
Q3 24
59.9%
Q2 24
41.4%
Q1 24
45.6%
Operating Margin
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
-491.4%
Q3 25
-12.4%
87.0%
Q2 25
-10.6%
Q1 25
-6.0%
-676.8%
Q4 24
-27.1%
Q3 24
-6.2%
-3.6%
Q2 24
-1.8%
-246.2%
Q1 24
-0.9%
Net Margin
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
-316.0%
Q3 25
-41.6%
60.0%
Q2 25
-36.9%
332.5%
Q1 25
-32.4%
-613.7%
Q4 24
-46.4%
480.3%
Q3 24
-31.2%
1.5%
Q2 24
-25.9%
-204.1%
Q1 24
-25.2%
484.9%
EPS (diluted)
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$-2.45
Q3 25
$-3.39
$0.43
Q2 25
$-3.17
$1.18
Q1 25
$-2.73
$-1.30
Q4 24
$-4.06
$1.41
Q3 24
$-2.74
$0.01
Q2 24
$-2.43
$-0.78
Q1 24
$-2.37
$2.76

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$44.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-585.8M
$1.4B
Total Assets
$1.2B
$2.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$44.9M
Q3 25
$33.5M
Q2 25
$216.3M
Q1 25
$108.4M
Q4 24
$85.0M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
$11.5M
Total Debt
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$300.6M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$297.3M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$328.8M
Q1 24
$1.2B
$177.6M
Stockholders' Equity
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$1.4B
Q3 25
$-585.8M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$-536.5M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$-493.9M
$960.0M
Q4 24
$-455.7M
$976.7M
Q3 24
$-386.1M
$703.9M
Q2 24
$-338.6M
$660.1M
Q1 24
$-296.8M
$732.0M
Total Assets
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$2.8B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$1.2B
$2.0B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$1.6B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$1.5B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.4B
$999.0M
Debt / Equity
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.31×
Q3 24
0.42×
Q2 24
0.50×
Q1 24
0.24×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-14.5M
$-139.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-16.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-12.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-75.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$-139.2M
Q3 25
$-14.5M
$770.0K
Q2 25
$-26.9M
$-48.8M
Q1 25
$-13.2M
$-33.8M
Q4 24
$-10.4M
$-68.5M
Q3 24
$-3.2M
$-4.2M
Q2 24
$-14.2M
$-16.4M
Q1 24
$-28.4M
$-26.3M
Free Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-16.9M
Q2 25
$-29.3M
Q1 25
$-17.8M
Q4 24
$-11.0M
Q3 24
$-11.1M
Q2 24
$-24.4M
Q1 24
$-32.5M
FCF Margin
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
Q3 25
-12.1%
Q2 25
-20.0%
Q1 25
-12.5%
Q4 24
-7.6%
Q3 24
-7.7%
Q2 24
-16.1%
Q1 24
-21.4%
Capex Intensity
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
Q3 25
1.7%
Q2 25
1.6%
Q1 25
3.2%
Q4 24
0.4%
Q3 24
5.5%
Q2 24
6.7%
Q1 24
2.7%
Cash Conversion
FAT
FAT
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
Q3 25
0.02×
Q2 25
-0.36×
Q1 25
Q4 24
-0.45×
Q3 24
-6.49×
Q2 24
Q1 24
-0.11×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FAT
FAT

Restaurant Sales$96.6M69%
Royalty$21.6M15%
Factory$9.6M7%
Advertising$9.1M7%
Franchisor$1.5M1%
Other$1.5M1%

HUT
HUT

High Performance Computing Colocation And Cloud$81.9M93%
Power$5.0M6%
Digital Infrastructure$1.6M2%

Related Comparisons