vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fat Brands, Inc (FAT) and Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Fat Brands, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($140.0M vs $88.5M, roughly 1.6× Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.). Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. runs the higher net margin — 35.5% vs -41.6%, a 77.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.4% vs -2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (14.3% CAGR vs -6.1%).

FAT Brands Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant and sports bar franchise operator headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.

Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc. was a bank holding company headquartered in Olney, Maryland and operating in the Washington metropolitan area. In addition to banking services, the company offered commercial and personal lines of insurance, surety bonds, workers compensation insurance, and professional liability insurance protection as well as financial planning, wealth management, and asset management for high-net-worth individuals, businesses, and associations. In April 2025, the company was acqu...

FAT vs MCB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FAT
FAT
1.6× larger
FAT
$140.0M
$88.5M
MCB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MCB
MCB
+27.7% gap
MCB
25.4%
-2.3%
FAT
Higher net margin
MCB
MCB
77.1% more per $
MCB
35.5%
-41.6%
FAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MCB
MCB
Annualised
MCB
14.3%
-6.1%
FAT

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Revenue
$140.0M
$88.5M
Net Profit
$-58.2M
$31.4M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-12.4%
Net Margin
-41.6%
35.5%
Revenue YoY
-2.3%
25.4%
Net Profit YoY
-30.1%
92.2%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.39
$2.92

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
$88.5M
Q4 25
$88.4M
Q3 25
$140.0M
$79.8M
Q2 25
$146.8M
$76.3M
Q1 25
$142.0M
$70.6M
Q4 24
$145.3M
$71.0M
Q3 24
$143.4M
$71.5M
Q2 24
$152.0M
$67.7M
Net Profit
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
$31.4M
Q4 25
$28.9M
Q3 25
$-58.2M
$7.1M
Q2 25
$-54.2M
$18.8M
Q1 25
$-46.0M
$16.4M
Q4 24
$-67.4M
$21.4M
Q3 24
$-44.8M
$12.3M
Q2 24
$-39.4M
$16.8M
Operating Margin
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
Q4 25
46.6%
Q3 25
-12.4%
12.8%
Q2 25
-10.6%
35.1%
Q1 25
-6.0%
33.1%
Q4 24
-27.1%
44.1%
Q3 24
-6.2%
24.6%
Q2 24
-1.8%
35.3%
Net Margin
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
35.5%
Q4 25
32.6%
Q3 25
-41.6%
8.9%
Q2 25
-36.9%
24.6%
Q1 25
-32.4%
23.2%
Q4 24
-46.4%
30.2%
Q3 24
-31.2%
17.2%
Q2 24
-25.9%
24.8%
EPS (diluted)
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
$2.92
Q4 25
$2.74
Q3 25
$-3.39
$0.67
Q2 25
$-3.17
$1.76
Q1 25
$-2.73
$1.45
Q4 24
$-4.06
$1.89
Q3 24
$-2.74
$1.08
Q2 24
$-2.43
$1.50

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-585.8M
$948.3M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$8.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$393.6M
Q3 25
$385.9M
Q2 25
$152.5M
Q1 25
$196.5M
Q4 24
$200.3M
Q3 24
$318.5M
Q2 24
$244.7M
Total Debt
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
$948.3M
Q4 25
$743.1M
Q3 25
$-585.8M
$732.0M
Q2 25
$-536.5M
$723.0M
Q1 25
$-493.9M
$737.8M
Q4 24
$-455.7M
$729.8M
Q3 24
$-386.1M
$715.2M
Q2 24
$-338.6M
$692.4M
Total Assets
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
$8.8B
Q4 25
$8.3B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$8.2B
Q2 25
$1.2B
$7.9B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$7.6B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$7.3B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$7.4B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$7.3B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-14.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-16.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-12.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-75.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$88.7M
Q3 25
$-14.5M
$31.8M
Q2 25
$-26.9M
$18.4M
Q1 25
$-13.2M
$7.8M
Q4 24
$-10.4M
$148.5M
Q3 24
$-3.2M
$4.8M
Q2 24
$-14.2M
$35.3M
Free Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-16.9M
Q2 25
$-29.3M
Q1 25
$-17.8M
Q4 24
$-11.0M
Q3 24
$-11.1M
Q2 24
$-24.4M
FCF Margin
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
-12.1%
Q2 25
-20.0%
Q1 25
-12.5%
Q4 24
-7.6%
Q3 24
-7.7%
Q2 24
-16.1%
Capex Intensity
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
1.7%
Q2 25
1.6%
Q1 25
3.2%
Q4 24
0.4%
Q3 24
5.5%
Q2 24
6.7%
Cash Conversion
FAT
FAT
MCB
MCB
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.07×
Q3 25
4.47×
Q2 25
0.98×
Q1 25
0.47×
Q4 24
6.93×
Q3 24
0.39×
Q2 24
2.10×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FAT
FAT

Restaurant Sales$96.6M69%
Royalty$21.6M15%
Factory$9.6M7%
Advertising$9.1M7%
Franchisor$1.5M1%
Other$1.5M1%

MCB
MCB

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons