vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fat Brands, Inc (FAT) and Regional Management Corp. (RM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Regional Management Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($167.3M vs $140.0M, roughly 1.2× Fat Brands, Inc). Regional Management Corp. runs the higher net margin — 6.8% vs -41.6%, a 48.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Regional Management Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs -2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Regional Management Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (8.2% CAGR vs -6.1%).

FAT Brands Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant and sports bar franchise operator headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.

Millennium Management LLC is an investment management firm with a multistrategy hedge fund offering. It is one of the world's largest alternative asset management firms with $83.4 billion assets under management as of January 2026. The firm operates in America, Europe and Asia. As of 2022, Millennium had posted the fourth highest net gains of any hedge fund since its inception in 1989.

FAT vs RM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RM
RM
1.2× larger
RM
$167.3M
$140.0M
FAT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RM
RM
+11.7% gap
RM
9.4%
-2.3%
FAT
Higher net margin
RM
RM
48.4% more per $
RM
6.8%
-41.6%
FAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
RM
RM
Annualised
RM
8.2%
-6.1%
FAT

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Revenue
$140.0M
$167.3M
Net Profit
$-58.2M
$11.4M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-12.4%
Net Margin
-41.6%
6.8%
Revenue YoY
-2.3%
9.4%
Net Profit YoY
-30.1%
62.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.39
$1.18

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
$167.3M
Q4 25
$169.7M
Q3 25
$140.0M
$165.5M
Q2 25
$146.8M
$157.4M
Q1 25
$142.0M
$153.0M
Q4 24
$145.3M
$154.8M
Q3 24
$143.4M
$146.3M
Q2 24
$152.0M
$143.0M
Net Profit
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
$11.4M
Q4 25
$12.9M
Q3 25
$-58.2M
$14.4M
Q2 25
$-54.2M
$10.1M
Q1 25
$-46.0M
$7.0M
Q4 24
$-67.4M
$9.9M
Q3 24
$-44.8M
$7.7M
Q2 24
$-39.4M
$8.4M
Operating Margin
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
Q4 25
9.5%
Q3 25
-12.4%
11.5%
Q2 25
-10.6%
8.6%
Q1 25
-6.0%
6.0%
Q4 24
-27.1%
8.2%
Q3 24
-6.2%
6.9%
Q2 24
-1.8%
7.8%
Net Margin
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
6.8%
Q4 25
7.6%
Q3 25
-41.6%
8.7%
Q2 25
-36.9%
6.4%
Q1 25
-32.4%
4.6%
Q4 24
-46.4%
6.4%
Q3 24
-31.2%
5.2%
Q2 24
-25.9%
5.9%
EPS (diluted)
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
$1.18
Q4 25
$1.30
Q3 25
$-3.39
$1.42
Q2 25
$-3.17
$1.03
Q1 25
$-2.73
$0.70
Q4 24
$-4.06
$0.96
Q3 24
$-2.74
$0.76
Q2 24
$-2.43
$0.86

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-585.8M
$375.8M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$2.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Total Debt
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.6B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$1.6B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$1.5B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$1.4B
Stockholders' Equity
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
$375.8M
Q4 25
$373.1M
Q3 25
$-585.8M
$371.9M
Q2 25
$-536.5M
$363.0M
Q1 25
$-493.9M
$357.9M
Q4 24
$-455.7M
$357.1M
Q3 24
$-386.1M
$352.9M
Q2 24
$-338.6M
$344.9M
Total Assets
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$2.1B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$1.2B
$2.0B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$1.9B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$1.9B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$1.8B
Debt / Equity
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.40×
Q3 25
4.23×
Q2 25
4.14×
Q1 25
4.11×
Q4 24
4.12×
Q3 24
3.94×
Q2 24
3.98×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-14.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-16.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-12.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-75.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$309.1M
Q3 25
$-14.5M
$86.7M
Q2 25
$-26.9M
$78.7M
Q1 25
$-13.2M
$63.7M
Q4 24
$-10.4M
$268.9M
Q3 24
$-3.2M
$75.1M
Q2 24
$-14.2M
$71.5M
Free Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$304.3M
Q3 25
$-16.9M
$85.7M
Q2 25
$-29.3M
$77.6M
Q1 25
$-17.8M
$62.4M
Q4 24
$-11.0M
$263.9M
Q3 24
$-11.1M
$73.8M
Q2 24
$-24.4M
$70.3M
FCF Margin
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
Q4 25
179.3%
Q3 25
-12.1%
51.8%
Q2 25
-20.0%
49.3%
Q1 25
-12.5%
40.8%
Q4 24
-7.6%
170.4%
Q3 24
-7.7%
50.4%
Q2 24
-16.1%
49.1%
Capex Intensity
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.8%
Q3 25
1.7%
0.6%
Q2 25
1.6%
0.6%
Q1 25
3.2%
0.8%
Q4 24
0.4%
3.3%
Q3 24
5.5%
0.9%
Q2 24
6.7%
0.8%
Cash Conversion
FAT
FAT
RM
RM
Q1 26
Q4 25
23.94×
Q3 25
6.04×
Q2 25
7.76×
Q1 25
9.09×
Q4 24
27.13×
Q3 24
9.80×
Q2 24
8.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FAT
FAT

Restaurant Sales$96.6M69%
Royalty$21.6M15%
Factory$9.6M7%
Advertising$9.1M7%
Franchisor$1.5M1%
Other$1.5M1%

RM
RM

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons