vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fat Brands, Inc (FAT) and RAMBUS INC (RMBS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

RAMBUS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($180.2M vs $140.0M, roughly 1.3× Fat Brands, Inc). RAMBUS INC runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs -41.6%, a 74.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RAMBUS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs -2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, RAMBUS INC's revenue compounded faster (16.8% CAGR vs -6.1%).

FAT Brands Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant and sports bar franchise operator headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.

Rambus Inc. is an American technology company that designs, develops and licenses chip interface technologies and architectures that are used in digital electronics products. The company, founded in 1990, is well known for inventing RDRAM and for its intellectual property-based litigation following the introduction of DDR-SDRAM memory.

FAT vs RMBS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RMBS
RMBS
1.3× larger
RMBS
$180.2M
$140.0M
FAT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RMBS
RMBS
+10.4% gap
RMBS
8.1%
-2.3%
FAT
Higher net margin
RMBS
RMBS
74.8% more per $
RMBS
33.2%
-41.6%
FAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
RMBS
RMBS
Annualised
RMBS
16.8%
-6.1%
FAT

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Revenue
$140.0M
$180.2M
Net Profit
$-58.2M
$59.9M
Gross Margin
79.7%
Operating Margin
-12.4%
34.3%
Net Margin
-41.6%
33.2%
Revenue YoY
-2.3%
8.1%
Net Profit YoY
-30.1%
-7.3%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.39
$0.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
$180.2M
Q4 25
$190.2M
Q3 25
$140.0M
$178.5M
Q2 25
$146.8M
$172.2M
Q1 25
$142.0M
$166.7M
Q4 24
$145.3M
$161.1M
Q3 24
$143.4M
$145.5M
Q2 24
$152.0M
$132.1M
Net Profit
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
$59.9M
Q4 25
$63.8M
Q3 25
$-58.2M
$48.4M
Q2 25
$-54.2M
$57.9M
Q1 25
$-46.0M
$60.3M
Q4 24
$-67.4M
$62.2M
Q3 24
$-44.8M
$48.7M
Q2 24
$-39.4M
$36.1M
Gross Margin
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
79.7%
Q4 25
78.9%
Q3 25
79.5%
Q2 25
79.8%
Q1 25
80.3%
Q4 24
80.4%
Q3 24
80.7%
Q2 24
79.7%
Operating Margin
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
34.3%
Q4 25
37.2%
Q3 25
-12.4%
35.4%
Q2 25
-10.6%
36.6%
Q1 25
-6.0%
37.9%
Q4 24
-27.1%
35.9%
Q3 24
-6.2%
37.6%
Q2 24
-1.8%
30.5%
Net Margin
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
33.2%
Q4 25
33.6%
Q3 25
-41.6%
27.1%
Q2 25
-36.9%
33.6%
Q1 25
-32.4%
36.2%
Q4 24
-46.4%
38.6%
Q3 24
-31.2%
33.4%
Q2 24
-25.9%
27.3%
EPS (diluted)
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
$0.55
Q4 25
$0.58
Q3 25
$-3.39
$0.44
Q2 25
$-3.17
$0.53
Q1 25
$-2.73
$0.56
Q4 24
$-4.06
$0.57
Q3 24
$-2.74
$0.45
Q2 24
$-2.43
$0.33

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$134.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-585.8M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$1.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
$134.3M
Q4 25
$182.8M
Q3 25
$79.2M
Q2 25
$87.8M
Q1 25
$132.2M
Q4 24
$99.8M
Q3 24
$114.0M
Q2 24
$124.6M
Total Debt
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.4B
Q3 25
$-585.8M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$-536.5M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$-493.9M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$-455.7M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$-386.1M
$1.0B
Q2 24
$-338.6M
$1.0B
Total Assets
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.2B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$1.3B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-14.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-16.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-12.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-75.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$99.8M
Q3 25
$-14.5M
$88.4M
Q2 25
$-26.9M
$94.4M
Q1 25
$-13.2M
$77.4M
Q4 24
$-10.4M
$59.0M
Q3 24
$-3.2M
$62.1M
Q2 24
$-14.2M
$70.4M
Free Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$93.3M
Q3 25
$-16.9M
$82.5M
Q2 25
$-29.3M
$87.9M
Q1 25
$-17.8M
$69.5M
Q4 24
$-11.0M
$52.5M
Q3 24
$-11.1M
$52.2M
Q2 24
$-24.4M
$59.1M
FCF Margin
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
Q4 25
49.0%
Q3 25
-12.1%
46.2%
Q2 25
-20.0%
51.0%
Q1 25
-12.5%
41.7%
Q4 24
-7.6%
32.6%
Q3 24
-7.7%
35.9%
Q2 24
-16.1%
44.7%
Capex Intensity
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.4%
Q3 25
1.7%
3.3%
Q2 25
1.6%
3.8%
Q1 25
3.2%
4.7%
Q4 24
0.4%
4.0%
Q3 24
5.5%
6.8%
Q2 24
6.7%
8.6%
Cash Conversion
FAT
FAT
RMBS
RMBS
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.56×
Q3 25
1.83×
Q2 25
1.63×
Q1 25
1.28×
Q4 24
0.95×
Q3 24
1.28×
Q2 24
1.95×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FAT
FAT

Restaurant Sales$96.6M69%
Royalty$21.6M15%
Factory$9.6M7%
Advertising$9.1M7%
Franchisor$1.5M1%
Other$1.5M1%

RMBS
RMBS

Product revenue$88.0M49%
Royalties$69.6M39%
Contract and other revenue$22.6M13%

Related Comparisons