vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fat Brands, Inc (FAT) and Shimmick Corp (SHIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Shimmick Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($141.9M vs $140.0M, roughly 1.0× Fat Brands, Inc). Shimmick Corp runs the higher net margin — -3.1% vs -41.6%, a 38.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Fat Brands, Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-16.9M vs $-28.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Fat Brands, Inc's revenue compounded faster (-6.1% CAGR vs -10.1%).

FAT Brands Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant and sports bar franchise operator headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.

Shimmick Corp is a U.S.-based heavy civil construction firm specializing in building and upgrading critical public infrastructure, including water facilities, transportation systems, dams, and environmental remediation projects. It primarily serves federal, state, and local government clients across North America, delivering complex large-scale construction solutions for public sector segments.

FAT vs SHIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SHIM
SHIM
1.0× larger
SHIM
$141.9M
$140.0M
FAT
Higher net margin
SHIM
SHIM
38.5% more per $
SHIM
-3.1%
-41.6%
FAT
More free cash flow
FAT
FAT
$11.8M more FCF
FAT
$-16.9M
$-28.7M
SHIM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FAT
FAT
Annualised
FAT
-6.1%
-10.1%
SHIM

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Revenue
$140.0M
$141.9M
Net Profit
$-58.2M
$-4.4M
Gross Margin
7.6%
Operating Margin
-12.4%
-2.2%
Net Margin
-41.6%
-3.1%
Revenue YoY
-2.3%
Net Profit YoY
-30.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.39
$-0.12

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
$141.9M
Q3 25
$140.0M
$128.4M
Q2 25
$146.8M
$122.1M
Q1 25
$142.0M
$103.6M
Q4 24
$145.3M
Q3 24
$143.4M
$166.0M
Q2 24
$152.0M
$90.6M
Q1 24
$152.0M
$120.0M
Net Profit
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
$-4.4M
Q3 25
$-58.2M
$-8.5M
Q2 25
$-54.2M
$-9.8M
Q1 25
$-46.0M
$-38.5M
Q4 24
$-67.4M
Q3 24
$-44.8M
$-1.6M
Q2 24
$-39.4M
$-51.4M
Q1 24
$-38.3M
$-33.3M
Gross Margin
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
7.6%
Q3 25
6.3%
Q2 25
3.8%
Q1 25
-20.1%
Q4 24
Q3 24
7.3%
Q2 24
-34.4%
Q1 24
-13.2%
Operating Margin
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
-2.2%
Q3 25
-12.4%
-5.5%
Q2 25
-10.6%
-7.3%
Q1 25
-6.0%
-39.3%
Q4 24
-27.1%
Q3 24
-6.2%
0.7%
Q2 24
-1.8%
-53.0%
Q1 24
-0.9%
-26.5%
Net Margin
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
-3.1%
Q3 25
-41.6%
-6.6%
Q2 25
-36.9%
-8.0%
Q1 25
-32.4%
-37.1%
Q4 24
-46.4%
Q3 24
-31.2%
-0.9%
Q2 24
-25.9%
-56.7%
Q1 24
-25.2%
-27.8%
EPS (diluted)
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
$-0.12
Q3 25
$-3.39
$-0.25
Q2 25
$-3.17
$-0.28
Q1 25
$-2.73
$-0.92
Q4 24
$-4.06
Q3 24
$-2.74
$-0.05
Q2 24
$-2.43
$-1.83
Q1 24
$-2.37
$-1.30

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$17.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
$57.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-585.8M
$-52.7M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$218.5M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
$17.6M
Q3 25
$21.4M
Q2 25
$16.3M
Q1 25
$33.7M
Q4 24
Q3 24
$26.0M
Q2 24
$22.4M
Q1 24
$27.3M
Total Debt
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
$57.5M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$36.4M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$31.4M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$9.5M
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$39.9M
Q2 24
$1.2B
Q1 24
$1.2B
$31.5M
Stockholders' Equity
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
$-52.7M
Q3 25
$-585.8M
$-49.5M
Q2 25
$-536.5M
$-42.6M
Q1 25
$-493.9M
$-34.7M
Q4 24
$-455.7M
Q3 24
$-386.1M
$973.0K
Q2 24
$-338.6M
$436.0K
Q1 24
$-296.8M
$38.1M
Total Assets
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
$218.5M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$203.0M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$227.7M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$233.9M
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$346.7M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$344.5M
Q1 24
$1.4B
$378.0M
Debt / Equity
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
41.01×
Q2 24
Q1 24
0.83×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-14.5M
$-23.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-16.9M
$-28.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-12.1%
-20.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.7%
3.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-75.0M
$-27.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
$-23.7M
Q3 25
$-14.5M
$-3.8M
Q2 25
$-26.9M
$-38.2M
Q1 25
$-13.2M
$44.9M
Q4 24
$-10.4M
Q3 24
$-3.2M
$12.7M
Q2 24
$-14.2M
$-43.9M
Q1 24
$-28.4M
$-35.0M
Free Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
$-28.7M
Q3 25
$-16.9M
$-4.2M
Q2 25
$-29.3M
$-38.7M
Q1 25
$-17.8M
$44.4M
Q4 24
$-11.0M
Q3 24
$-11.1M
$10.3M
Q2 24
$-24.4M
$-46.8M
Q1 24
$-32.5M
$-39.6M
FCF Margin
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
-20.2%
Q3 25
-12.1%
-3.2%
Q2 25
-20.0%
-31.7%
Q1 25
-12.5%
42.9%
Q4 24
-7.6%
Q3 24
-7.7%
6.2%
Q2 24
-16.1%
-51.7%
Q1 24
-21.4%
-33.0%
Capex Intensity
FAT
FAT
SHIM
SHIM
Q4 25
3.5%
Q3 25
1.7%
0.3%
Q2 25
1.6%
0.4%
Q1 25
3.2%
0.5%
Q4 24
0.4%
Q3 24
5.5%
1.4%
Q2 24
6.7%
3.3%
Q1 24
2.7%
3.8%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FAT
FAT

Restaurant Sales$96.6M69%
Royalty$21.6M15%
Factory$9.6M7%
Advertising$9.1M7%
Franchisor$1.5M1%
Other$1.5M1%

SHIM
SHIM

Shimmick Projects$106.8M75%
Non Core Projects$35.1M25%

Related Comparisons