vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fat Brands, Inc (FAT) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Texas Pacific Land Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($211.6M vs $140.0M, roughly 1.5× Fat Brands, Inc). Texas Pacific Land Corporation runs the higher net margin — 58.3% vs -41.6%, a 99.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Texas Pacific Land Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.9% vs -2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Texas Pacific Land Corporation's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs -6.1%).

FAT Brands Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant and sports bar franchise operator headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.

The Texas Pacific Land Corporation is a publicly traded real estate operating company with its administrative office in Dallas, Texas. Owning over 880,000 acres (3,600 km2) in 20 West Texas counties, TPL is among the largest private landowners in the state of Texas. It was previously organized as a publicly traded trust taxed as a corporation, and operated under the name Texas Pacific Land Trust.

FAT vs TPL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TPL
TPL
1.5× larger
TPL
$211.6M
$140.0M
FAT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TPL
TPL
+16.2% gap
TPL
13.9%
-2.3%
FAT
Higher net margin
TPL
TPL
99.9% more per $
TPL
58.3%
-41.6%
FAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TPL
TPL
Annualised
TPL
10.2%
-6.1%
FAT

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Revenue
$140.0M
$211.6M
Net Profit
$-58.2M
$123.3M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-12.4%
70.5%
Net Margin
-41.6%
58.3%
Revenue YoY
-2.3%
13.9%
Net Profit YoY
-30.1%
4.2%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.39
$-8.59

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$211.6M
Q3 25
$140.0M
$203.1M
Q2 25
$146.8M
$187.5M
Q1 25
$142.0M
$196.0M
Q4 24
$145.3M
$185.8M
Q3 24
$143.4M
$173.6M
Q2 24
$152.0M
$172.3M
Q1 24
$152.0M
$174.1M
Net Profit
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$123.3M
Q3 25
$-58.2M
$121.2M
Q2 25
$-54.2M
$116.1M
Q1 25
$-46.0M
$120.7M
Q4 24
$-67.4M
$118.4M
Q3 24
$-44.8M
$106.6M
Q2 24
$-39.4M
$114.6M
Q1 24
$-38.3M
$114.4M
Operating Margin
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
70.5%
Q3 25
-12.4%
73.4%
Q2 25
-10.6%
76.6%
Q1 25
-6.0%
76.6%
Q4 24
-27.1%
76.7%
Q3 24
-6.2%
73.4%
Q2 24
-1.8%
77.3%
Q1 24
-0.9%
78.1%
Net Margin
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
58.3%
Q3 25
-41.6%
59.7%
Q2 25
-36.9%
61.9%
Q1 25
-32.4%
61.6%
Q4 24
-46.4%
63.7%
Q3 24
-31.2%
61.4%
Q2 24
-25.9%
66.5%
Q1 24
-25.2%
65.7%
EPS (diluted)
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$-8.59
Q3 25
$-3.39
$5.27
Q2 25
$-3.17
$5.05
Q1 25
$-2.73
$5.24
Q4 24
$-4.06
$5.14
Q3 24
$-2.74
$4.63
Q2 24
$-2.43
$4.98
Q1 24
$-2.37
$4.97

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$144.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-585.8M
$1.5B
Total Assets
$1.2B
$1.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$144.8M
Q3 25
$531.8M
Q2 25
$543.9M
Q1 25
$460.4M
Q4 24
$369.8M
Q3 24
$533.9M
Q2 24
$894.7M
Q1 24
$837.1M
Total Debt
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Q1 24
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$1.5B
Q3 25
$-585.8M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$-536.5M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$-493.9M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$-455.7M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$-386.1M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$-338.6M
$1.2B
Q1 24
$-296.8M
$1.1B
Total Assets
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$1.6B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$1.2B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$1.3B
Q1 24
$1.4B
$1.3B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-14.5M
$113.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-16.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-12.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.92×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-75.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$113.7M
Q3 25
$-14.5M
$154.6M
Q2 25
$-26.9M
$120.9M
Q1 25
$-13.2M
$156.7M
Q4 24
$-10.4M
$126.6M
Q3 24
$-3.2M
$118.6M
Q2 24
$-14.2M
$98.3M
Q1 24
$-28.4M
$147.2M
Free Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-16.9M
Q2 25
$-29.3M
Q1 25
$-17.8M
Q4 24
$-11.0M
Q3 24
$-11.1M
Q2 24
$-24.4M
Q1 24
$-32.5M
FCF Margin
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
Q3 25
-12.1%
Q2 25
-20.0%
Q1 25
-12.5%
Q4 24
-7.6%
Q3 24
-7.7%
Q2 24
-16.1%
Q1 24
-21.4%
Capex Intensity
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
Q3 25
1.7%
Q2 25
1.6%
Q1 25
3.2%
Q4 24
0.4%
Q3 24
5.5%
Q2 24
6.7%
Q1 24
2.7%
Cash Conversion
FAT
FAT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
0.92×
Q3 25
1.28×
Q2 25
1.04×
Q1 25
1.30×
Q4 24
1.07×
Q3 24
1.11×
Q2 24
0.86×
Q1 24
1.29×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FAT
FAT

Restaurant Sales$96.6M69%
Royalty$21.6M15%
Factory$9.6M7%
Advertising$9.1M7%
Franchisor$1.5M1%
Other$1.5M1%

TPL
TPL

Water Serviceand Operations Segment$98.2M46%
Water Sales And Royalties$60.7M29%
Produced Water Royalties$33.5M16%
Easementand Sundry$20.6M10%

Related Comparisons