vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fat Brands, Inc (FAT) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($208.0M vs $140.0M, roughly 1.5× Fat Brands, Inc). VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 16.3% vs -41.6%, a 57.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fat Brands, Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.3% vs -10.9%). Fat Brands, Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-16.9M vs $-74.1M). Over the past eight quarters, VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-3.2% CAGR vs -6.1%).

FAT Brands Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant and sports bar franchise operator headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.

Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.

FAT vs VRTS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
VRTS
VRTS
1.5× larger
VRTS
$208.0M
$140.0M
FAT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FAT
FAT
+8.6% gap
FAT
-2.3%
-10.9%
VRTS
Higher net margin
VRTS
VRTS
57.9% more per $
VRTS
16.3%
-41.6%
FAT
More free cash flow
FAT
FAT
$57.2M more FCF
FAT
$-16.9M
$-74.1M
VRTS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VRTS
VRTS
Annualised
VRTS
-3.2%
-6.1%
FAT

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Revenue
$140.0M
$208.0M
Net Profit
$-58.2M
$33.9M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-12.4%
19.1%
Net Margin
-41.6%
16.3%
Revenue YoY
-2.3%
-10.9%
Net Profit YoY
-30.1%
-14.2%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.39
$5.15

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
$208.0M
Q3 25
$140.0M
$216.4M
Q2 25
$146.8M
$210.5M
Q1 25
$142.0M
$217.9M
Q4 24
$145.3M
$233.5M
Q3 24
$143.4M
$227.0M
Q2 24
$152.0M
$224.4M
Q1 24
$152.0M
$222.0M
Net Profit
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
$33.9M
Q3 25
$-58.2M
$31.3M
Q2 25
$-54.2M
$42.7M
Q1 25
$-46.0M
$28.1M
Q4 24
$-67.4M
$39.5M
Q3 24
$-44.8M
$49.1M
Q2 24
$-39.4M
$26.0M
Q1 24
$-38.3M
$37.9M
Operating Margin
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
19.1%
Q3 25
-12.4%
21.7%
Q2 25
-10.6%
21.5%
Q1 25
-6.0%
16.8%
Q4 24
-27.1%
21.7%
Q3 24
-6.2%
24.3%
Q2 24
-1.8%
19.7%
Q1 24
-0.9%
14.5%
Net Margin
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
16.3%
Q3 25
-41.6%
14.5%
Q2 25
-36.9%
20.3%
Q1 25
-32.4%
12.9%
Q4 24
-46.4%
16.9%
Q3 24
-31.2%
21.6%
Q2 24
-25.9%
11.6%
Q1 24
-25.2%
17.1%
EPS (diluted)
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
$5.15
Q3 25
$-3.39
$4.65
Q2 25
$-3.17
$6.12
Q1 25
$-2.73
$4.05
Q4 24
$-4.06
$4.65
Q3 24
$-2.74
$5.71
Q2 24
$-2.43
$2.43
Q1 24
$-2.37
$4.10

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
$390.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-585.8M
$934.0M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$4.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.42×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Total Debt
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
$390.0M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$390.6M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$231.3M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$231.7M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$232.1M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$237.5M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$247.6M
Q1 24
$1.2B
$253.0M
Stockholders' Equity
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
$934.0M
Q3 25
$-585.8M
$918.7M
Q2 25
$-536.5M
$896.4M
Q1 25
$-493.9M
$893.7M
Q4 24
$-455.7M
$897.5M
Q3 24
$-386.1M
$889.0M
Q2 24
$-338.6M
$868.7M
Q1 24
$-296.8M
$871.7M
Total Assets
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
$4.3B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$3.9B
Q2 25
$1.2B
$3.7B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$3.7B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$4.0B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$3.6B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$3.6B
Q1 24
$1.4B
$3.5B
Debt / Equity
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
0.42×
Q3 25
0.43×
Q2 25
0.26×
Q1 25
0.26×
Q4 24
0.26×
Q3 24
0.27×
Q2 24
0.29×
Q1 24
0.29×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-14.5M
$-67.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-16.9M
$-74.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-12.1%
-35.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.7%
3.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-1.99×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-75.0M
$100.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
$-67.2M
Q3 25
$-14.5M
$108.3M
Q2 25
$-26.9M
$75.8M
Q1 25
$-13.2M
$-3.8M
Q4 24
$-10.4M
$1.8M
Q3 24
$-3.2M
$69.1M
Q2 24
$-14.2M
$70.0M
Q1 24
$-28.4M
$-34.5M
Free Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
$-74.1M
Q3 25
$-16.9M
$106.9M
Q2 25
$-29.3M
$74.2M
Q1 25
$-17.8M
$-6.8M
Q4 24
$-11.0M
$-3.8M
Q3 24
$-11.1M
$68.7M
Q2 24
$-24.4M
$68.6M
Q1 24
$-32.5M
$-36.5M
FCF Margin
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
-35.6%
Q3 25
-12.1%
49.4%
Q2 25
-20.0%
35.2%
Q1 25
-12.5%
-3.1%
Q4 24
-7.6%
-1.6%
Q3 24
-7.7%
30.3%
Q2 24
-16.1%
30.6%
Q1 24
-21.4%
-16.4%
Capex Intensity
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
3.3%
Q3 25
1.7%
0.7%
Q2 25
1.6%
0.7%
Q1 25
3.2%
1.4%
Q4 24
0.4%
2.4%
Q3 24
5.5%
0.2%
Q2 24
6.7%
0.6%
Q1 24
2.7%
0.9%
Cash Conversion
FAT
FAT
VRTS
VRTS
Q4 25
-1.99×
Q3 25
3.45×
Q2 25
1.77×
Q1 25
-0.13×
Q4 24
0.04×
Q3 24
1.41×
Q2 24
2.69×
Q1 24
-0.91×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FAT
FAT

Restaurant Sales$96.6M69%
Royalty$21.6M15%
Factory$9.6M7%
Advertising$9.1M7%
Franchisor$1.5M1%
Other$1.5M1%

VRTS
VRTS

Open End Funds$68.9M33%
Retail Separate Accounts$51.3M25%
Institutional Accounts$39.6M19%
Administration And Shareholder Service Fees$18.4M9%
Closed End Funds$15.9M8%
Distribution And Service Fees$12.3M6%

Related Comparisons