vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fatpipe Inc (FATN) and INSPIRE VETERINARY PARTNERS, INC. (IVP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INSPIRE VETERINARY PARTNERS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.3M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.1× Fatpipe Inc). Fatpipe Inc runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs -58.5%, a 66.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INSPIRE VETERINARY PARTNERS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 3.2%).
Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc. is a U.S.-based operator of companion animal veterinary clinics. It delivers full-spectrum pet healthcare services including preventive care, diagnostic testing, surgery, dental care, and emergency treatment for dogs, cats and other small pets, serving communities across multiple U.S. states.
FATN vs IVP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $4.3M |
| Net Profit | $310.7K | $-2.5M |
| Gross Margin | 87.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | -45.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | -58.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 816.0% | 27.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | $310.7K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-43.4K | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $741.2K | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | 87.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 92.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 94.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.0% | -45.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | -61.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -55.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -46.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -55.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -54.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -59.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | -58.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.8% | -70.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -66.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -119.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -86.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -77.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -70.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6M | $11.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $21.2M | $4.2M |
| Total Assets | $32.4M | $24.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | 2.82× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $523.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $681.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $69.1K |
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $21.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $446.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $269.9K |
| Q4 25 | $32.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.2M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0M | $20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | 2.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.24× | 26.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $240.9K | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -30.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.78× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-4.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $240.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.8K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-508.6K | $-898.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-677.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $149.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-551.1K | $-910.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-709.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $126.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -30.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.0% | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -156.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -68.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FATN
| Products | $2.6M | 63% |
| Other | $1.5M | 37% |
IVP
| Services | $3.1M | 73% |
| Products | $1.2M | 27% |
