vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fatpipe Inc (FATN) and Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fatpipe Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $3.2M, roughly 1.3× Global Self Storage, Inc.). Global Self Storage, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.2% vs 7.6%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fatpipe Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -0.9%).
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., known as Hertz, is an American car rental company based in Estero, Florida. The company operates its namesake Hertz brand, along with the brands Dollar Rent A Car, Firefly Car Rental, and Thrifty Car Rental.
FATN vs SELF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $3.2M |
| Net Profit | $310.7K | $322.8K |
| Gross Margin | 87.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 21.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 10.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | -0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 816.0% | 282.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $310.7K | $322.8K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-43.4K | $496.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $741.2K | $664.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $555.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $84.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $591.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $266.1K |
| Q4 25 | 87.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 92.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 94.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 21.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.0% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.5% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $7.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $21.2M | $46.5M |
| Total Assets | $32.4M | $64.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $21.2M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $46.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $47.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.8M |
| Q4 25 | $32.4M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.2M | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0M | $65.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $66.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $66.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $240.9K | $4.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.78× | 13.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $240.9K | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.8K | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-508.6K | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $797.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-551.1K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.78× | 13.86× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.69× | 2.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FATN
| Products | $2.6M | 63% |
| Other | $1.5M | 37% |
SELF
Segment breakdown not available.