vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. (FBYD) and MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC (MIND). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.7M vs $6.6M, roughly 1.5× Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.). MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -4.5%, a 5.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (383.5% vs -20.0%). MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($801.0K vs $-4.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (108.4% CAGR vs -14.9%).
500 Global is an early-stage venture fund and seed accelerator founded in 2010 by Dave McClure and Christine Tsai. The fund admitted a first "class" of twelve startups to its incubator office in Mountain View, California in February 2011. They expanded to a second class of 21 in June 2011 and a third class of 34 in October 2011. 500 Global has $2.3 billion in assets under management (AUM) as of March 2024.
Mitcham Industries, Inc. is a company founded in 1987, and is based in Huntsville, Texas. The company markets geophysical and other equipment to seismic data acquisition contractors conducting surveys on land, marsh, and marine areas, both shallow and deep water. There are mainly two segments operating in the company, namely an Equipment Leasing segment and an Equipment Manufacturing segment. In October 2011, the Company opened a new logistics and repair facility in Budapest, Hungary, and thr...
FBYD vs MIND — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.6M | $9.7M |
| Net Profit | $-296.0K | $62.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 46.6% |
| Operating Margin | -30.9% | 8.0% |
| Net Margin | -4.5% | 0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 383.5% | -20.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 97.5% | -95.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.6M | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5M | $13.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-296.0K | $62.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.4M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.1M | $-970.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.9M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | $798.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $954.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $114.0M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 46.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.7% |
| Q4 25 | -30.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -90.9% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -53.0% | -8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -371.1% | 18.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -335.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -118.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -195.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -350.5% | 17.3% |
| Q4 25 | -4.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -256.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 985.2% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -473.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -871.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1899.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 446.5% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7521.4% | 10.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.39 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.27 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9M | $19.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $15.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.9M | $39.9M |
| Total Assets | $66.7M | $47.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.31× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $825.0K | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $828.0K | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $924.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.9M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.2M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.0K | $26.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $27.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0M | $25.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-44.7M | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-61.7M | $22.6M |
| Q4 25 | $66.7M | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.8M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.2M | $36.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | $36.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.2M | $36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.5M | $37.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.9M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.8M | $33.5M |
| Q4 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.3M | $894.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.3M | $801.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -66.0% | 8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 14.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $5.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | $894.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.3M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $945.0K | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $657.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | $801.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.4M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $853.0K | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $978.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $566.0K |
| Q4 25 | -66.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -329.6% | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.9% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -278.7% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -114.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -145.6% | -49.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -248.8% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.06× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.33× | -4.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.03× | 0.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
