vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FirstCash Holdings, Inc. (FCFS) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FirstCash Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($501.3M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.9× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). FirstCash Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 20.8% vs 0.7%, a 20.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FirstCash Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.2% vs -16.5%).
FirstCash Holdings, Inc. is an American pawnshop company headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas which operates retail pawn stores in the U.S. and Latin America. It is a publicly traded company listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
FCFS vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $501.3M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $104.2M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 20.8% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.2% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.7% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.35 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $501.3M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $411.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.1M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $371.1M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $363.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $363.5M | $305.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $366.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $104.2M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.0% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.35 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.86 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.87 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.86 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.44 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.08 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.35 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $125.2M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.0M | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.7M | $802.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $82.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $740.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.79× | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.83× | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.85× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.75× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $206.6M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.98× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $206.6M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.9M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.6M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.2M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.98× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.95× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.51× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.16× | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.00× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FCFS
| US Pawn Segment | $292.2M | 58% |
| Retail POS Payment Solutions | $209.8M | 42% |
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
