vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FirstCash Holdings, Inc. (FCFS) and Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hillenbrand, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($550.2M vs $501.3M, roughly 1.1× FirstCash Holdings, Inc.). FirstCash Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 20.8% vs -0.4%, a 21.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FirstCash Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.2% vs -22.2%). Over the past eight quarters, FirstCash Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.9% CAGR vs -16.3%).
FirstCash Holdings, Inc. is an American pawnshop company headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas which operates retail pawn stores in the U.S. and Latin America. It is a publicly traded company listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
Hillenbrand, Inc. is a global diversified industrial firm that designs, manufactures, and distributes specialized processing equipment and durable industrial solutions. It serves food & beverage, agriculture, manufacturing, waste management sectors, with operations across North America, Europe, and APAC.
FCFS vs HI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $501.3M | $550.2M |
| Net Profit | $104.2M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | -2.2% |
| Net Margin | 20.8% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.2% | -22.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.7% | -134.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.35 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $501.3M | $550.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $411.0M | $652.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.1M | $598.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $371.1M | $715.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.7M | $706.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $363.1M | $837.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $363.5M | $786.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $366.8M | $785.3M |
| Q4 25 | $104.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.8M | $75.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.6M | $-40.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.5M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.8M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | $-248.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.0% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | -32.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | -31.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.7% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | $2.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.86 | $1.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.87 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.86 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.44 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.08 | $-3.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.35 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $125.2M | $173.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $173.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.2M | $164.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.5M | $162.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.0M | $458.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.1M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.3M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.7M | $223.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.1M | $224.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $5.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.79× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.83× | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.85× | 1.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.87× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.85× | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.75× | 1.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $206.6M | $-27.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-31.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.98× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $206.6M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.8M | $67.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.9M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.1M | $166.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.2M | $45.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.5M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $153.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.64× | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.95× | -0.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.37× | -1.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | 11.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.00× | 0.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FCFS
| US Pawn Segment | $292.2M | 58% |
| Retail POS Payment Solutions | $209.8M | 42% |
HI
| Transferred At Point In Time | $256.5M | 47% |
| Transferred Over Time | $207.1M | 38% |
| Molding Technology Solutions | $86.6M | 16% |