vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FirstCash Holdings, Inc. (FCFS) and MODINE MANUFACTURING CO (MOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

MODINE MANUFACTURING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($805.0M vs $501.3M, roughly 1.6× FirstCash Holdings, Inc.). FirstCash Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 20.8% vs -5.9%, a 26.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.5% vs 21.2%). Over the past eight quarters, FirstCash Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.9% CAGR vs 15.5%).

FirstCash Holdings, Inc. is an American pawnshop company headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas which operates retail pawn stores in the U.S. and Latin America. It is a publicly traded company listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange.

Modine Manufacturing is a thermal management company established in 1916 in the United States. The company started as Modine Manufacturing Company by Arthur B Modine who patented the Spirex radiator for tractors. The Modine company manufactured the Turbotube radiator for Ford Model T cars. The company built the world's first vehicular wind tunnel in Racine, Wisconsin in 1941. During WWII, Modine manufactured aftercoolers for the P-51 Mustang fighter plane. After WWII, Modine introduced the Ai...

FCFS vs MOD — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MOD
MOD
1.6× larger
MOD
$805.0M
$501.3M
FCFS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MOD
MOD
+9.3% gap
MOD
30.5%
21.2%
FCFS
Higher net margin
FCFS
FCFS
26.7% more per $
FCFS
20.8%
-5.9%
MOD
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FCFS
FCFS
Annualised
FCFS
16.9%
15.5%
MOD

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Revenue
$501.3M
$805.0M
Net Profit
$104.2M
$-47.4M
Gross Margin
23.1%
Operating Margin
28.5%
11.1%
Net Margin
20.8%
-5.9%
Revenue YoY
21.2%
30.5%
Net Profit YoY
24.7%
-215.6%
EPS (diluted)
$2.35
$-0.90

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
$501.3M
$805.0M
Q3 25
$411.0M
$738.9M
Q2 25
$385.1M
$682.8M
Q1 25
$371.1M
$647.2M
Q4 24
$413.7M
$616.8M
Q3 24
$363.1M
$658.0M
Q2 24
$363.5M
$661.5M
Q1 24
$366.8M
$603.5M
Net Profit
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
$104.2M
$-47.4M
Q3 25
$82.8M
$44.4M
Q2 25
$59.8M
$51.2M
Q1 25
$83.6M
$49.6M
Q4 24
$83.5M
$41.0M
Q3 24
$64.8M
$46.1M
Q2 24
$49.1M
$47.3M
Q1 24
$61.4M
$25.8M
Gross Margin
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
23.1%
Q3 25
22.3%
Q2 25
24.2%
Q1 25
25.6%
Q4 24
24.3%
Q3 24
25.2%
Q2 24
24.6%
Q1 24
22.4%
Operating Margin
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
28.5%
11.1%
Q3 25
27.4%
9.9%
Q2 25
21.1%
11.1%
Q1 25
30.0%
11.5%
Q4 24
26.5%
9.6%
Q3 24
23.5%
11.4%
Q2 24
18.2%
11.2%
Q1 24
22.3%
7.8%
Net Margin
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
20.8%
-5.9%
Q3 25
20.1%
6.0%
Q2 25
15.5%
7.5%
Q1 25
22.5%
7.7%
Q4 24
20.2%
6.6%
Q3 24
17.9%
7.0%
Q2 24
13.5%
7.2%
Q1 24
16.7%
4.3%
EPS (diluted)
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
$2.35
$-0.90
Q3 25
$1.86
$0.83
Q2 25
$1.34
$0.95
Q1 25
$1.87
$0.92
Q4 24
$1.86
$0.76
Q3 24
$1.44
$0.86
Q2 24
$1.08
$0.88
Q1 24
$1.35
$0.48

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$125.2M
$98.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.2B
$570.7M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.3B
$1.1B
Total Assets
$5.3B
$2.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.98×
0.51×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
$125.2M
$98.7M
Q3 25
$130.2M
$83.8M
Q2 25
$101.5M
$124.5M
Q1 25
$146.0M
$71.6M
Q4 24
$175.1M
$83.8M
Q3 24
$106.3M
$78.6M
Q2 24
$113.7M
$72.9M
Q1 24
$135.1M
$60.1M
Total Debt
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
$2.2B
$570.7M
Q3 25
$2.2B
$525.8M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$482.1M
Q1 25
$1.7B
$296.7M
Q4 24
$1.7B
$330.0M
Q3 24
$1.7B
$359.1M
Q2 24
$1.7B
$405.7M
Q1 24
$1.5B
$399.9M
Stockholders' Equity
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
$2.3B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$2.2B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$2.1B
$1.0B
Q1 25
$2.1B
$910.2M
Q4 24
$2.1B
$855.1M
Q3 24
$2.0B
$858.8M
Q2 24
$2.0B
$788.4M
Q1 24
$2.0B
$747.6M
Total Assets
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
$5.3B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$5.2B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$4.5B
$2.2B
Q1 25
$4.4B
$1.9B
Q4 24
$4.5B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$4.4B
$1.9B
Q2 24
$4.3B
$1.9B
Q1 24
$4.2B
$1.9B
Debt / Equity
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
0.98×
0.51×
Q3 25
1.01×
0.50×
Q2 25
0.79×
0.48×
Q1 25
0.83×
0.33×
Q4 24
0.85×
0.39×
Q3 24
0.87×
0.42×
Q2 24
0.85×
0.51×
Q1 24
0.75×
0.53×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$206.6M
$24.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-17.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-2.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.98×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-20.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
$206.6M
$24.7M
Q3 25
$135.8M
$1.4M
Q2 25
$116.9M
$27.7M
Q1 25
$126.6M
$54.8M
Q4 24
$198.1M
$60.7M
Q3 24
$113.1M
$57.3M
Q2 24
$106.2M
$40.5M
Q1 24
$122.5M
$39.6M
Free Cash Flow
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
$-17.1M
Q3 25
$-30.5M
Q2 25
$200.0K
Q1 25
$27.1M
Q4 24
$44.7M
Q3 24
$43.8M
Q2 24
$13.7M
Q1 24
$-4.3M
FCF Margin
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
-2.1%
Q3 25
-4.1%
Q2 25
0.0%
Q1 25
4.2%
Q4 24
7.2%
Q3 24
6.7%
Q2 24
2.1%
Q1 24
-0.7%
Capex Intensity
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
5.2%
Q3 25
4.3%
Q2 25
4.0%
Q1 25
4.3%
Q4 24
2.6%
Q3 24
2.1%
Q2 24
4.1%
Q1 24
7.3%
Cash Conversion
FCFS
FCFS
MOD
MOD
Q4 25
1.98×
Q3 25
1.64×
0.03×
Q2 25
1.95×
0.54×
Q1 25
1.51×
1.10×
Q4 24
2.37×
1.48×
Q3 24
1.74×
1.24×
Q2 24
2.16×
0.86×
Q1 24
2.00×
1.53×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FCFS
FCFS

US Pawn Segment$292.2M58%
Retail POS Payment Solutions$209.8M42%

MOD
MOD

Data Centers$296.9M37%
Performance Technologies$266.0M33%
Hvac Technologies$107.1M13%
Air Cooled$92.4M11%
Lb White$25.6M3%
Climate By Design$10.2M1%
Absolutaire$7.0M1%

Related Comparisons