vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FirstCash Holdings, Inc. (FCFS) and Enpro Inc. (NPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FirstCash Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($501.3M vs $295.4M, roughly 1.7× Enpro Inc.). FirstCash Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 20.8% vs -10.8%, a 31.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FirstCash Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.2% vs 14.3%). Over the past eight quarters, FirstCash Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.9% CAGR vs 7.1%).
FirstCash Holdings, Inc. is an American pawnshop company headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas which operates retail pawn stores in the U.S. and Latin America. It is a publicly traded company listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
Enpro is a US-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products and materials for technology-intensive sectors. The company serves industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, power generation, heavy-duty trucking, agricultural machinery, chemical processing, pulp and paper, and life sciences from 61 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, worldwide. It is organized under three segments: Sealing Technologies, Advanced Surface Technologies, and Engin...
FCFS vs NPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $501.3M | $295.4M |
| Net Profit | $104.2M | $-32.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | 20.8% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.2% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.7% | -330.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.35 | $-1.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $501.3M | $295.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $411.0M | $286.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.1M | $288.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $371.1M | $273.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.7M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $363.1M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $363.5M | $271.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $366.8M | $257.5M |
| Q4 25 | $104.2M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.8M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.6M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.5M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.8M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | $12.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 41.2% |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.4% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.0% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | 10.9% |
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.7% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $2.35 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.86 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.87 | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.86 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.44 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.08 | $1.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.35 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $125.2M | $114.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | $655.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $114.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.2M | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.5M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.0M | $240.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.1M | $236.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.3M | $206.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.7M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.1M | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $655.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $640.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $644.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.85× | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.75× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $206.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.98× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $206.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.8M | $65.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.9M | $52.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.6M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $59.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.1M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.2M | $43.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.5M | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $53.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $42.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.64× | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.95× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.51× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.37× | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | 2.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.16× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.00× | 0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FCFS
| US Pawn Segment | $292.2M | 58% |
| Retail POS Payment Solutions | $209.8M | 42% |
NPO
| Sealing Technologies Segment | $187.0M | 63% |
| General Industrial | $71.3M | 24% |
| Power Generation | $19.9M | 7% |
| Oiland Gas Market | $15.0M | 5% |
| Semiconductors | $2.2M | 1% |
