vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FOCUS UNIVERSAL INC. (FCUV) and InflaRx N.V. (IFRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FOCUS UNIVERSAL INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($35.3K vs $25.7K, roughly 1.4× InflaRx N.V.).
Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is an American Fortune 500 company that provides hospital and healthcare services, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In 2024, UHS reported total revenues of $15.8 billion.
InflaRx N.V. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company specializing in the development of novel anti-inflammatory therapies targeting the complement C5a pathway. Its pipeline addresses unmet medical needs for severe inflammatory diseases including autoimmune and rare inflammatory disorders, serving global patient populations.
FCUV vs IFRX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $35.3K | $25.7K |
| Net Profit | $-1.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | -35.1% | 98.6% |
| Operating Margin | -4366.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -4261.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 214.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -10.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $25.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.3K | $42.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.3K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.2K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $179.5K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-82.8K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 98.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -95.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 107.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4366.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -668.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1507.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2353.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -676.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 1869.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4261.7% | -36559.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -657.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1942.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -217803.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -732.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.57 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.73 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $845.6K | — |
| Total Assets | $1.7M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $114.1K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $465.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $845.6K | $61.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $3.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $79.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $100.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $5.3M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.4M | $-33.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4047.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-33.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-997.9K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-892.1K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-925.2K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-897.1K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-925.5K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4047.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -653.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -753.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2614.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -499.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 1117.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -0.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
