vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. (FDMT) and HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($114.8M vs $85.1M, roughly 1.3× 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.). 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs -46.8%, a 69.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8508900.0% vs 13.3%). Over the past eight quarters, 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5412.6% CAGR vs 4.2%).
4D Molecular Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in the research and development of targeted adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapies. Its core product candidates address unmet medical needs in ophthalmology, cardiology, and pulmonary disease segments, serving global patient populations with rare and common hard-to-treat conditions.
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) is a specialized investment firm focused on sustainable infrastructure assets covering renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable real estate and low-carbon utility segments. It primarily operates in North American markets, providing long-term capital to eligible sustainable projects and delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors through recurring cash flows from operational underlying assets.
FDMT vs HASI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $85.1M | $114.8M |
| Net Profit | $19.4M | $-53.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | -57.4% |
| Net Margin | 22.8% | -46.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 8508900.0% | 13.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 139.1% | -176.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $85.1M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.0K | $103.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0K | $85.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0K | $96.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0K | $101.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0K | $82.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0K | $94.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.0K | $105.8M |
| Q4 25 | $19.4M | $-53.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-56.9M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-54.7M | $98.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.0M | $56.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.8M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.0M | $26.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.4M | $123.0M |
| Q4 25 | 17.3% | -57.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -67983.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -396373.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -383007.1% | 84.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 90.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1704400.0% | -32.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -849120.0% | 39.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -136200.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -63195.6% | 80.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -364386.7% | 114.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -342657.1% | 58.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1461433.3% | -23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -699060.0% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -115717.9% | 116.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.01 | $0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.98 | $0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.86 | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.79 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.63 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.66 | $0.98 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $402.7M | $110.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $505.7M | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $566.7M | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $402.7M | $110.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $305.1M | $301.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $293.2M | $86.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $321.4M | $67.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $424.9M | $129.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.9M | $44.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $541.9M | $145.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $525.9M | $61.4M |
| Q4 25 | $505.7M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $469.7M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $510.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $552.9M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $588.3M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $600.6M | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $566.7M | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $424.0M | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $473.6M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $515.7M | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $560.4M | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.0M | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $620.1M | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $629.9M | $6.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.6M | $167.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 33.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.47× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-109.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | $167.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.5M | $-121.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-43.4M | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.8M | $-37.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-134.6M | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-29.4M | $21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.2M | $-24.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.1M | $20.9M |
| Q4 25 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-43.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-138.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-31.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 33.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -51765.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -289620.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -345635.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -13837100.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1038966.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -611840.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -106421.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 101.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 440.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4507.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 378600.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59266.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6980.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2535.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.94× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
