vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FirstEnergy (FE) and Stryker Corporation (SYK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stryker Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.6× FirstEnergy). Stryker Corporation runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs -1.3%, a 13.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FirstEnergy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.6% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, FirstEnergy's revenue compounded faster (7.5% CAGR vs 5.4%).
FirstEnergy Corp. is an electric utility headquartered in Akron, Ohio. It was established when Ohio Edison merged with Centerior Energy in 1997.
The Stryker is a family of eight-wheeled armored fighting vehicles derived from the Canadian LAV III, which in turn derived from the Swiss Mowag Piranha. Stryker vehicles are produced by General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada (GDLS-C) for the United States Army in a plant in London, Ontario. It has four-wheel drive (8×4) and can be switched to all-wheel drive (8×8).
FE vs SYK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $6.0B |
| Net Profit | $-49.0M | $745.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 63.3% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 15.5% |
| Net Margin | -1.3% | 12.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.6% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -118.8% | 13.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $1.93 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $745.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-49.0M | $849.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $859.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $268.0M | $884.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.0M | $654.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.0M | $546.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.0M | $834.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0M | $825.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 63.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 64.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 63.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 63.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 63.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.0% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.1% | 18.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.5% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 19.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 15.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.93 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.08 | $2.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.76 | $2.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.46 | $2.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.62 | $1.69 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | $1.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.73 | $2.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | $2.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $57.0M | $2.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $25.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.5B | $23.0M |
| Total Assets | $55.9B | $46.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.04× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $57.0M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $569.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.0M | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $439.0M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.5B | $22.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.9B | $21.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6B | $20.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5B | $20.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5B | $19.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $46.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $55.9B | $47.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9B | $47.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.2B | $46.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.8B | $46.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.0B | $43.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.8B | $43.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.0B | $39.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $581.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-30.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 30.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.78× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.0B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $581.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $637.0M | $250.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $775.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $633.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-30.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-471.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-136.0M | $928.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-368.0M | $127.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-250.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-229.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.0M | $481.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.4% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.9% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.1% | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.7% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.92× | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.04× | 1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.77× | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.00× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 1.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.71× | 0.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FE
| Integrated Segment | $1.4B | 37% |
| Other | $1.4B | 36% |
| Stand Alone Transmission Segment | $466.0M | 12% |
| Industrial Customers | $167.0M | 4% |
| Mid Atlantic Interstate Transmission LLC | $118.0M | 3% |
| Transmission | $105.0M | 3% |
| Transmission Segment | $68.0M | 2% |
| Tr AIL | $63.0M | 2% |
| Internal Customers | $10.0M | 0% |
| Wholesale Sales | $6.0M | 0% |
SYK
Segment breakdown not available.