vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FirstEnergy (FE) and United Rentals (URI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

United Rentals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.0B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.0× FirstEnergy). United Rentals runs the higher net margin — 13.3% vs -1.3%, a 14.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FirstEnergy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.6% vs 7.2%). United Rentals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1B vs $-30.0M). Over the past eight quarters, United Rentals's revenue compounded faster (114.0% CAGR vs 7.5%).

FirstEnergy Corp. is an electric utility headquartered in Akron, Ohio. It was established when Ohio Edison merged with Centerior Energy in 1997.

United Rentals, Inc. is an American equipment rental company, with about 16 percent of the North American market share as of 2022. It owns the largest rental fleet in the world with approximately 4,800 classes of equipment totaling about $20.59 billion in original equipment cost (OEC) as of 2025. The company has a combined total of 1,625 locations, including an integrated network of 1,504 rental locations in North America, 38 in Europe, 23 in Australia and 19 in New Zealand.

FE vs URI — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
URI
URI
1.0× larger
URI
$4.0B
$3.8B
FE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FE
FE
+12.4% gap
FE
19.6%
7.2%
URI
Higher net margin
URI
URI
14.6% more per $
URI
13.3%
-1.3%
FE
More free cash flow
URI
URI
$1.1B more FCF
URI
$1.1B
$-30.0M
FE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
URI
URI
Annualised
URI
114.0%
7.5%
FE

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FE
FE
URI
URI
Revenue
$3.8B
$4.0B
Net Profit
$-49.0M
$531.0M
Gross Margin
36.9%
Operating Margin
-0.6%
21.8%
Net Margin
-1.3%
13.3%
Revenue YoY
19.6%
7.2%
Net Profit YoY
-118.8%
2.5%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.08
$8.43

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
$4.0B
Q4 25
$3.8B
$992.0M
Q3 25
$4.1B
$938.0M
Q2 25
$3.4B
$872.0M
Q1 25
$3.8B
$893.0M
Q4 24
$3.2B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$3.7B
$874.0M
Q2 24
$3.3B
$870.0M
Net Profit
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
$531.0M
Q4 25
$-49.0M
$653.0M
Q3 25
$441.0M
$701.0M
Q2 25
$268.0M
$622.0M
Q1 25
$360.0M
$518.0M
Q4 24
$261.0M
$689.0M
Q3 24
$419.0M
$708.0M
Q2 24
$45.0M
$636.0M
Gross Margin
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
36.9%
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Operating Margin
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
21.8%
Q4 25
-0.6%
Q3 25
20.0%
Q2 25
19.1%
Q1 25
20.0%
90.0%
Q4 24
19.3%
Q3 24
19.5%
Q2 24
12.9%
Net Margin
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
13.3%
Q4 25
-1.3%
65.8%
Q3 25
10.6%
74.7%
Q2 25
7.9%
71.3%
Q1 25
9.6%
58.0%
Q4 24
8.2%
67.6%
Q3 24
11.2%
81.0%
Q2 24
1.4%
73.1%
EPS (diluted)
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
$8.43
Q4 25
$-0.08
$10.20
Q3 25
$0.76
$10.91
Q2 25
$0.46
$9.59
Q1 25
$0.62
$7.91
Q4 24
$0.45
$10.41
Q3 24
$0.73
$10.70
Q2 24
$0.08
$9.54

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FE
FE
URI
URI
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$57.0M
$156.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$25.5B
$13.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$12.5B
$9.0B
Total Assets
$55.9B
$29.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.04×
1.55×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
$156.0M
Q4 25
$57.0M
$459.0M
Q3 25
$1.4B
$512.0M
Q2 25
$569.0M
$548.0M
Q1 25
$132.0M
$542.0M
Q4 24
$111.0M
$457.0M
Q3 24
$439.0M
$479.0M
Q2 24
$60.0M
$467.0M
Total Debt
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
$13.9B
Q4 25
$25.5B
$12.7B
Q3 25
$25.5B
$12.6B
Q2 25
$23.7B
$12.1B
Q1 25
$21.2B
$11.5B
Q4 24
$22.5B
$12.2B
Q3 24
$21.6B
$11.9B
Q2 24
$20.8B
$11.5B
Stockholders' Equity
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
$9.0B
Q4 25
$12.5B
$9.0B
Q3 25
$12.8B
$9.0B
Q2 25
$12.9B
$9.0B
Q1 25
$12.6B
$8.8B
Q4 24
$12.5B
$8.6B
Q3 24
$12.4B
$8.6B
Q2 24
$12.5B
$8.3B
Total Assets
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
$29.9B
Q4 25
$55.9B
$29.9B
Q3 25
$55.9B
$30.1B
Q2 25
$54.2B
$29.2B
Q1 25
$52.8B
$28.1B
Q4 24
$52.0B
$28.2B
Q3 24
$50.8B
$28.4B
Q2 24
$51.0B
$27.6B
Debt / Equity
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
1.55×
Q4 25
2.04×
1.41×
Q3 25
1.99×
1.40×
Q2 25
1.85×
1.34×
Q1 25
1.69×
1.31×
Q4 24
1.81×
1.42×
Q3 24
1.74×
1.38×
Q2 24
1.67×
1.39×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FE
FE
URI
URI
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.1B
$1.5B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-30.0M
$1.1B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-0.8%
26.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
30.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.85×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-1.0B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$1.1B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$845.0M
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$637.0M
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.0B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$775.0M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$1.3B
Free Cash Flow
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$-30.0M
Q3 25
$-471.0M
Q2 25
$-136.0M
Q1 25
$-368.0M
Q4 24
$-250.0M
$471.0M
Q3 24
$-229.0M
$-168.0M
Q2 24
$170.0M
$-263.0M
FCF Margin
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
26.4%
Q4 25
-0.8%
Q3 25
-11.4%
Q2 25
-4.0%
Q1 25
-9.8%
Q4 24
-7.9%
46.2%
Q3 24
-6.1%
-19.2%
Q2 24
5.2%
-30.2%
Capex Intensity
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
Q4 25
30.7%
Q3 25
31.7%
Q2 25
36.0%
Q1 25
26.7%
Q4 24
40.7%
56.6%
Q3 24
26.9%
157.0%
Q2 24
28.7%
175.6%
Cash Conversion
FE
FE
URI
URI
Q1 26
2.85×
Q4 25
1.92×
Q3 25
1.92×
1.68×
Q2 25
4.04×
2.14×
Q1 25
1.77×
2.75×
Q4 24
4.00×
1.52×
Q3 24
1.85×
1.70×
Q2 24
24.71×
1.99×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FE
FE

Integrated Segment$1.4B37%
Other$1.4B36%
Stand Alone Transmission Segment$466.0M12%
Industrial Customers$167.0M4%
Mid Atlantic Interstate Transmission LLC$118.0M3%
Transmission$105.0M3%
Transmission Segment$68.0M2%
Tr AIL$63.0M2%
Internal Customers$10.0M0%
Wholesale Sales$6.0M0%

URI
URI

Equipment rentals$3.4B86%
Sales of rental equipment$350.0M9%
Service and other revenues$92.0M2%
Sales of new equipment$84.0M2%
Contractor supplies sales$40.0M1%

Related Comparisons