vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FirstEnergy (FE) and Zimmer Biomet (ZBH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FirstEnergy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.8× Zimmer Biomet). Zimmer Biomet runs the higher net margin — 11.4% vs -1.3%, a 12.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FirstEnergy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.6% vs 9.3%). Zimmer Biomet produced more free cash flow last quarter ($245.9M vs $-30.0M). Over the past eight quarters, FirstEnergy's revenue compounded faster (7.5% CAGR vs 3.7%).
FirstEnergy Corp. is an electric utility headquartered in Akron, Ohio. It was established when Ohio Edison merged with Centerior Energy in 1997.
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded American medical device company. It was founded in 1927 to produce aluminum splints. The firm is headquartered in Warsaw, Indiana, where it is part of the medical devices business cluster.
FE vs ZBH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $-49.0M | $238.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 17.9% |
| Net Margin | -1.3% | 11.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.6% | 9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -118.8% | 30.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $1.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $238.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-49.0M | $139.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $230.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $268.0M | $152.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.0M | $182.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.0M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.0M | $249.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0M | $242.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 64.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 72.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 70.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.1% | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.5% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 18.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.08 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.76 | $1.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.46 | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.62 | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | $1.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.73 | $1.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | $1.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $57.0M | $424.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $25.5B | $7.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.5B | $12.7B |
| Total Assets | $55.9B | $22.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.04× | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $424.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $57.0M | $591.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $569.0M | $556.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.0M | $525.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $439.0M | $569.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $420.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.5B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.9B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6B | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5B | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4B | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5B | $12.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $55.9B | $23.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9B | $23.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.2B | $22.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.8B | $22.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.0B | $21.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.8B | $21.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.0B | $21.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $359.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-30.0M | $245.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.8% | 11.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 30.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.0B | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $359.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $517.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $418.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $378.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $637.0M | $382.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $506.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $775.0M | $395.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $369.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $245.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-30.0M | $442.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-471.0M | $363.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-136.0M | $328.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-368.0M | $338.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-250.0M | $454.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-229.0M | $351.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.0M | $316.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.4% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.0% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.8% | 17.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.9% | 22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 16.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.7% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.92× | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.04× | 2.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.77× | 2.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.00× | 2.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 1.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.71× | 1.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FE
| Integrated Segment | $1.4B | 37% |
| Other | $1.4B | 36% |
| Stand Alone Transmission Segment | $466.0M | 12% |
| Industrial Customers | $167.0M | 4% |
| Mid Atlantic Interstate Transmission LLC | $118.0M | 3% |
| Transmission | $105.0M | 3% |
| Transmission Segment | $68.0M | 2% |
| Tr AIL | $63.0M | 2% |
| Internal Customers | $10.0M | 0% |
| Wholesale Sales | $6.0M | 0% |
ZBH
Segment breakdown not available.
