vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM) and FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $17.1M, roughly 1.5× FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC). FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs -28.1%, a 38.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.3% vs -8.2%). FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.1M vs $-12.7M). Over the past eight quarters, FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
FEIM vs FSP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $26.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-7.3M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 59.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | -27.9% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | -28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.1% | 14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $28.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.0K | $-8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0K | $-7.6M |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | 60.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | 59.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | 62.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.2% | 59.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | 61.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | 64.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | 64.7% |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | -30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | -29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | -78.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | -29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | -52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | -68.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.4% | -24.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | -30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | -29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | -79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | -30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | -52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | -68.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | -24.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.60 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.25 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $30.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.5M | $607.0M |
| Total Assets | $92.3M | $892.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $30.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $40.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $34.2M |
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | $607.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $615.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | $624.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.8M | $633.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.2M | $655.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $665.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $682.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.7M | $703.9M |
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | $892.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.2M | $901.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.7M | $903.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.4M | $916.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $946.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $981.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.7M | $1.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-523.0K | $3.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.1M | $-12.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.6% | -48.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 63.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.5M | $-25.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-523.0K | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-155.0K | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $-648.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-786.0K | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $-15.8M |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | -48.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | -21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.9% | -36.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | -57.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | -16.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | -50.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 63.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 28.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.85× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
FSP
Segment breakdown not available.