vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ladder Capital Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.3M vs $17.1M, roughly 1.3× FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC). Ladder Capital Corp runs the higher net margin — 71.0% vs 10.5%, a 60.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.3% vs -18.0%). Ladder Capital Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($78.7M vs $-1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs -22.5%).
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
Ladder Capital Corp is a leading commercial real estate finance firm operating primarily across the United States. It originates and manages a diversified portfolio of senior secured commercial mortgage loans, mezzanine debt, commercial mortgage-backed securities, and direct real estate assets, serving property owners, operators and developers across major market segments.
FEIM vs LADR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $22.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $15.9M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 69.5% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 71.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | -18.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.1% | -49.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $22.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $27.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $34.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $37.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $15.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.0K | $19.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $11.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $31.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $32.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0K | $16.4M |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 72.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | 96.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 74.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 90.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.4% | 49.4% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 71.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 69.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 79.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | 56.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 115.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 71.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 93.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 44.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.60 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.25 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $38.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.5M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $92.3M | $5.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $134.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $479.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.7M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.2M | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.7M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.4M | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.3M | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.7M | $5.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-523.0K | $87.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.1M | $78.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.6% | 352.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 37.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | 5.49× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.5M | $118.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-523.0K | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-155.0K | $44.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $-28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $133.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $169.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $45.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $-20.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $78.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.0K | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-786.0K | $43.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $-29.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $127.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $166.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $44.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $-21.7M |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | 352.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 93.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | 201.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.9% | -145.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 468.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 432.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | 131.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | -58.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 37.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | 5.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.05× | 2.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.24× | -2.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.60× | 6.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.85× | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.36× | -1.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
LADR
Segment breakdown not available.
