vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM) and LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDMARK BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.8M vs $17.1M, roughly 1.1× FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs 10.5%, a 16.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDMARK BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 8.3%). Over the past eight quarters, LANDMARK BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs 11.8%).
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
FEIM vs LARK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $18.8M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $5.1M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 27.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.1% | 7.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $18.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $14.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.0K | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | 30.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 24.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | 28.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 20.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $0.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.60 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.25 | $0.68 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $31.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $92.3M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $155.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | $148.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.8M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.2M | $136.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $139.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $128.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.3M | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-523.0K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-523.0K | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-155.0K | $439.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $4.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.0K | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-786.0K | $354.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $3.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | 112.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.9% | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 75.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 49.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | 25.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | 4.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.05× | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.24× | 1.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 4.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.60× | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.85× | 1.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
