vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM) and Nurix Therapeutics, Inc. (NRIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.1M vs $13.6M, roughly 1.3× Nurix Therapeutics, Inc.). FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs -576.1%, a 586.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.3% vs 2.2%). FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.1M vs $-73.0M). Over the past eight quarters, FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs -9.5%).
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
Nurix Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing and commercializing novel targeted protein degradation therapies for cancer, immune disorders and other serious unmet medical needs. Its core pipeline leverages proprietary E3 ubiquitin ligase modulation technology, with operations primarily based in the United States and collaborative partnerships with global pharmaceutical firms.
FEIM vs NRIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $13.6M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-78.2M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | -612.0% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | -576.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.1% | -33.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $-0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $18.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $-78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.0K | $-86.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $-43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $-56.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $-58.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $-49.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-44.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0K | $-41.5M |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | -612.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | -1157.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | -109.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | -340.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | -486.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | -433.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | -401.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.4% | -272.6% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | -576.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | -1094.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | -98.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | -305.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | -440.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | -388.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | -368.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | -250.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $-1.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.60 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $-0.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.25 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.76 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $247.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.5M | $538.7M |
| Total Assets | $92.3M | $688.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $247.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $84.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $75.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $110.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | $116.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $49.8M |
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | $538.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $372.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | $447.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.8M | $480.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.2M | $527.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $376.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $370.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.7M | $168.7M |
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | $688.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.2M | $522.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.7M | $591.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.4M | $615.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $669.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $513.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.3M | $511.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.7M | $312.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-523.0K | $-67.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.1M | $-73.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.6% | -537.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 37.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.5M | $-263.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-523.0K | $-67.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-57.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-155.0K | $-63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $-61.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $-48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $-42.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $-39.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $-42.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $-73.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.0K | $-60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-786.0K | $-65.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $-64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-50.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $-44.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $-41.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $-44.8M |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | -537.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | -761.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | -149.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.9% | -349.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | -382.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | -353.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | -344.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | -270.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 18.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.85× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
NRIX
| Pfizer | $11.9M | 88% |
| Gilead Agreement | $1.7M | 13% |
