vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM) and Orange County Bancorp, Inc. (OBT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($33.0M vs $17.1M, roughly 1.9× FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.6% vs 10.5%, a 27.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Orange County Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.6% vs 8.3%). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.3M vs $-1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Orange County Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.3% CAGR vs 11.8%).
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is a Delaware-registered bank holding company operating mainly in New York, U.S. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, loans and wealth management solutions, serving individual consumers, small and mid-sized corporate clients in its regional footprint.
FEIM vs OBT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $33.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $12.4M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 41.4% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 37.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | 20.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.1% | 73.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | $32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $28.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $27.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $25.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.0K | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $8.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0K | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 40.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 36.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.4% | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.60 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.25 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.5M | $284.4M |
| Total Assets | $92.3M | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | $284.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $270.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | $252.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.8M | $201.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.2M | $185.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.7M | $168.7M |
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.2M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.4M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.7M | $2.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-523.0K | $43.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.1M | $41.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.6% | 125.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 7.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | 3.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.5M | $69.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-523.0K | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-155.0K | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $34.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.0K | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-786.0K | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | 125.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 87.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 120.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | 7.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | 3.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 3.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.05× | -0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.24× | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 4.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.60× | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.85× | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.36× | 0.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
OBT
Segment breakdown not available.