vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM) and RED RIVER BANCSHARES INC (RRBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RED RIVER BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($33.2M vs $17.1M, roughly 1.9× FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC). RED RIVER BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 34.4% vs 10.5%, a 23.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RED RIVER BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 8.3%). RED RIVER BANCSHARES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($42.2M vs $-1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, RED RIVER BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (12.4% CAGR vs 11.8%).
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
Red River Bancshares Inc is a U.S. regional financial holding company operating through its wholly owned subsidiary Red River Bank. It provides a full suite of retail and commercial banking products including deposit accounts, personal and commercial loans, mortgage services, and wealth management, primarily serving customers across Louisiana, with a focus on local communities and small to mid-sized enterprises.
FEIM vs RRBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $33.2M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $11.4M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 42.8% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 34.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.1% | 22.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $1.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $31.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $27.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $26.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $26.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.0K | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0K | $8.2M |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 42.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 43.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 40.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 36.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.4% | 38.5% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 33.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 33.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | 34.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 31.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $1.72 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $1.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $1.51 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.60 | $1.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $1.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.25 | $1.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $1.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $1.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $213.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.5M | $365.1M |
| Total Assets | $92.3M | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $213.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $161.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $210.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $252.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $269.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $232.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | $213.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $229.8M |
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | $365.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $351.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | $335.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.8M | $333.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.2M | $319.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $324.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $307.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.7M | $299.3M |
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.2M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.7M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.4M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.3M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.7M | $3.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-523.0K | $44.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.1M | $42.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.6% | 127.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 7.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | 3.92× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.5M | $75.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-523.0K | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $16.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-155.0K | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $38.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $14.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.0K | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-786.0K | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $33.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $13.4M |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | 127.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 49.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.9% | 45.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 116.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 60.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | 50.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | 3.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 1.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.05× | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.24× | 1.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 4.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.60× | 1.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.85× | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.36× | 1.76× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
RRBI
Segment breakdown not available.
