vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM) and Tectonic Financial, Inc. (TECTP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tectonic Financial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.0M vs $17.1M, roughly 1.3× FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC). Tectonic Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.8% vs 10.5%, a 13.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tectonic Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.9% vs 8.3%). FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.1M vs $-17.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Tectonic Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (270.5% CAGR vs 11.8%).
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
Tectonic Financial, Inc.TECTPEarnings & Financial Report
Tectonic Financial, Inc. is a US-based diversified financial services provider. It offers core services including wealth management, investment banking, capital markets advisory, and tailored financial solutions. Its key client segments cover high-net-worth individuals, institutional investors, and small to mid-sized enterprises across North America.
FEIM vs TECTP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $23.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 30.6% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 23.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | 17.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.1% | 15.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.0K | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0K | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 26.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.4% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.60 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.25 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.5M | $119.2M |
| Total Assets | $92.3M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | $114.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.8M | $111.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.2M | $113.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $112.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $110.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.7M | $108.5M |
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.7M | $997.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.4M | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $863.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $847.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.3M | $777.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.7M | $777.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-523.0K | $-17.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.1M | $-17.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.6% | -74.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | -3.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-523.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-155.0K | $-32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $-86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.0K | $-17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-786.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-86.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $-3.3M |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | -74.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.9% | -163.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | -406.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | -115.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | -165.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | -18.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | -3.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.05× | -7.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.24× | -8.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | -28.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.60× | -4.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.85× | -9.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.36× | -1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
TECTP
Segment breakdown not available.
