vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FEMASYS INC (FEMY) and T Stamp Inc (IDAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
T Stamp Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($908.9K vs $813.4K, roughly 1.1× FEMASYS INC). T Stamp Inc runs the higher net margin — -279.9% vs -485.7%, a 205.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FEMASYS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.9% vs -39.3%). T Stamp Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.0M vs $-4.3M). Over the past eight quarters, FEMASYS INC's revenue compounded faster (73.2% CAGR vs 25.9%).
Femasys Inc. is a medical technology firm specializing in developing and commercializing minimally invasive diagnostic and therapeutic devices for women's health. Its core products address unmet clinical needs in fertility care, gynecology and obstetrics, serving healthcare providers and patients mainly across North American and European markets.
T Stamp Inc, trading under ticker IDAI, develops AI-powered identity verification, trust scoring, and fraud prevention solutions. It serves clients across fintech, healthcare, and e-commerce segments, primarily operating in North America to help organizations securely authenticate user identities and mitigate fraud risks.
FEMY vs IDAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $813.4K | $908.9K |
| Net Profit | $-4.0M | $-2.5M |
| Gross Margin | 62.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -568.3% | -224.9% |
| Net Margin | -485.7% | -279.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 39.9% | -39.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.9% | 57.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $813.4K | $908.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $729.4K | $872.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $409.3K | $812.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $341.3K | $545.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $581.6K | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.9K | $511.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $221.5K | $500.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $271.1K | $573.7K |
| Q4 25 | $-4.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.2M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.6M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | 62.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 65.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 67.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -568.3% | -224.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -500.9% | -203.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -941.1% | -207.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1600.1% | -396.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -812.0% | -81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -922.4% | -523.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2023.7% | -524.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1277.1% | -496.7% |
| Q4 25 | -485.7% | -279.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -575.1% | -219.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1120.5% | -210.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1727.9% | -395.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -881.0% | -401.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -974.7% | -245.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2115.1% | -519.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1327.5% | -466.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.72 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.69 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.23 | $-0.89 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $-3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.24 | $-1.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.21 | $-3.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.17 | $-3.97 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.3M | $6.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9M | $8.7M |
| Total Assets | $20.7M | $11.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.3M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $292.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $598.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | $659.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.8M | $816.7K |
| Q4 25 | $5.9M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $4.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $750.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.6M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.4M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.4M | $5.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.2M | $2.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.3M | $2.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -531.7% | 215.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.2% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-19.2M | $-5.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.2M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.4M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.5M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.6M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.2M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.5M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | -531.7% | 215.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -765.3% | -459.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1086.6% | -258.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1424.7% | -289.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -890.9% | -182.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1060.1% | -475.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2035.8% | -320.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1708.6% | -376.6% |
| Q4 25 | 17.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.3% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.8% | 0.5% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
