vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FEMASYS INC (FEMY) and LGL GROUP INC (LGL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FEMASYS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($813.4K vs $803.0K, roughly 1.0× LGL GROUP INC). LGL GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — -3.4% vs -485.7%, a 482.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FEMASYS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.9% vs 23.0%). Over the past eight quarters, FEMASYS INC's revenue compounded faster (73.2% CAGR vs 43.1%).
Femasys Inc. is a medical technology firm specializing in developing and commercializing minimally invasive diagnostic and therapeutic devices for women's health. Its core products address unmet clinical needs in fertility care, gynecology and obstetrics, serving healthcare providers and patients mainly across North American and European markets.
LGL Group Inc is a global electronic components manufacturer that designs, produces and markets high-performance frequency control products, radio frequency components and integrated circuit solutions. It primarily serves aerospace, defense, telecommunications, industrial and medical technology end markets, supplying specialized parts with strict reliability requirements.
FEMY vs LGL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $813.4K | $803.0K |
| Net Profit | $-4.0M | $-27.0K |
| Gross Margin | 62.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -568.3% | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | -485.7% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 39.9% | 23.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.9% | -113.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $813.4K | $803.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $729.4K | $661.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $409.3K | $491.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $341.3K | $498.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $581.6K | $653.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.9K | $650.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $221.5K | $531.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $271.1K | $392.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-4.0M | $-27.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.2M | $772.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $-51.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.9M | $-6.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | $202.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $72.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $137.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.6M | $21.0K |
| Q4 25 | 62.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 65.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 67.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -568.3% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -500.9% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -941.1% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1600.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -812.0% | 37.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -922.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2023.7% | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1277.1% | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | -485.7% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -575.1% | 116.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1120.5% | -10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1727.9% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -881.0% | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -974.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2115.1% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1327.5% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.23 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.24 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.21 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.17 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.3M | $41.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9M | $43.5M |
| Total Assets | $20.7M | $46.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.3M | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | $41.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $41.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $41.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $41.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $41.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | $41.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.8M | $40.9M |
| Q4 25 | $5.9M | $43.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $39.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $39.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $39.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $38.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.6M | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $46.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $43.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $43.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $43.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.4M | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $42.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.4M | $42.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.2M | $-355.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -531.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-19.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.2M | $-355.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.4M | $275.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $-190.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $340.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | $-17.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.5M | $528.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | $203.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $160.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -531.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -765.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1086.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1424.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -890.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1060.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2035.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1708.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
