vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FORUM ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (FET) and Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

FORUM ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($208.7M vs $151.7M, roughly 1.4× Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.). FORUM ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -5.5%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (128.4% vs 3.2%). Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($13.0M vs $1.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (134.4% CAGR vs 0.8%).

Forum Energy Technologies is an American oilfield products company that provides products and services to the oil and gas, and renewable industries worldwide.

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a late-stage clinical biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative therapeutic candidates for unmet medical needs in ophthalmology, dermatology, and other specialty care areas. It operates primarily in the United States, with lead product candidates targeting common, underdiagnosed conditions including demodex blepharitis and rosacea.

FET vs TARS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FET
FET
1.4× larger
FET
$208.7M
$151.7M
TARS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TARS
TARS
+125.2% gap
TARS
128.4%
3.2%
FET
Higher net margin
FET
FET
7.7% more per $
FET
2.2%
-5.5%
TARS
More free cash flow
TARS
TARS
$11.6M more FCF
TARS
$13.0M
$1.4M
FET
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TARS
TARS
Annualised
TARS
134.4%
0.8%
FET

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Revenue
$208.7M
$151.7M
Net Profit
$4.5M
$-8.4M
Gross Margin
29.2%
Operating Margin
5.3%
-5.3%
Net Margin
2.2%
-5.5%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
128.4%
Net Profit YoY
300.4%
63.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.39
$-0.17

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$208.7M
Q4 25
$202.2M
$151.7M
Q3 25
$196.2M
$118.7M
Q2 25
$199.8M
$102.7M
Q1 25
$193.3M
$78.3M
Q4 24
$201.0M
$66.4M
Q3 24
$207.8M
$48.1M
Q2 24
$205.2M
$40.8M
Net Profit
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$4.5M
Q4 25
$2.1M
$-8.4M
Q3 25
$-20.6M
$-12.6M
Q2 25
$7.7M
$-20.3M
Q1 25
$1.1M
$-25.1M
Q4 24
$-103.5M
$-23.1M
Q3 24
$-14.8M
$-23.4M
Q2 24
$-6.7M
$-33.3M
Gross Margin
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
29.2%
Q4 25
30.2%
Q3 25
20.5%
Q2 25
29.7%
Q1 25
30.2%
Q4 24
31.1%
Q3 24
31.6%
Q2 24
30.7%
Operating Margin
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
5.3%
Q4 25
6.3%
-5.3%
Q3 25
-3.1%
-12.2%
Q2 25
7.4%
-21.6%
Q1 25
4.6%
-33.5%
Q4 24
-53.1%
-36.8%
Q3 24
4.3%
-52.3%
Q2 24
3.9%
-81.6%
Net Margin
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
2.2%
Q4 25
1.0%
-5.5%
Q3 25
-10.5%
-10.6%
Q2 25
3.9%
-19.8%
Q1 25
0.6%
-32.1%
Q4 24
-51.5%
-34.8%
Q3 24
-7.1%
-48.7%
Q2 24
-3.3%
-81.6%
EPS (diluted)
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$0.39
Q4 25
$0.25
$-0.17
Q3 25
$-1.76
$-0.30
Q2 25
$0.61
$-0.48
Q1 25
$0.09
$-0.64
Q4 24
$-8.41
$-0.57
Q3 24
$-1.20
$-0.61
Q2 24
$-0.54
$-0.88

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$37.5M
$417.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$153.7M
$72.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$280.7M
$343.4M
Total Assets
$763.1M
$562.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.55×
0.21×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$37.5M
Q4 25
$34.7M
$417.3M
Q3 25
$31.7M
$401.8M
Q2 25
$39.0M
$381.1M
Q1 25
$31.1M
$407.9M
Q4 24
$44.7M
$291.4M
Q3 24
$33.3M
$317.0M
Q2 24
$31.8M
$323.6M
Total Debt
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$153.7M
Q4 25
$135.9M
$72.4M
Q3 25
$140.0M
$72.3M
Q2 25
$159.3M
$72.1M
Q1 25
$171.4M
$72.0M
Q4 24
$188.4M
$71.8M
Q3 24
$231.5M
$71.7M
Q2 24
$252.9M
$71.6M
Stockholders' Equity
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$280.7M
Q4 25
$291.1M
$343.4M
Q3 25
$297.3M
$335.1M
Q2 25
$334.2M
$332.6M
Q1 25
$320.0M
$342.5M
Q4 24
$319.9M
$224.5M
Q3 24
$443.5M
$237.5M
Q2 24
$442.0M
$252.2M
Total Assets
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$763.1M
Q4 25
$752.5M
$562.2M
Q3 25
$770.1M
$534.6M
Q2 25
$810.1M
$495.0M
Q1 25
$790.1M
$500.8M
Q4 24
$816.0M
$377.0M
Q3 24
$973.7M
$376.3M
Q2 24
$976.8M
$376.8M
Debt / Equity
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
0.55×
Q4 25
0.47×
0.21×
Q3 25
0.47×
0.22×
Q2 25
0.48×
0.22×
Q1 25
0.54×
0.21×
Q4 24
0.59×
0.32×
Q3 24
0.52×
0.30×
Q2 24
0.57×
0.28×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.6M
$19.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.4M
$13.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
0.7%
8.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.36×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$58.5M
$-22.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$1.6M
Q4 25
$22.4M
$19.3M
Q3 25
$22.9M
$18.3M
Q2 25
$15.8M
$-29.4M
Q1 25
$9.3M
$-20.7M
Q4 24
$38.5M
$-22.2M
Q3 24
$25.6M
$-8.7M
Q2 24
$23.1M
$-14.4M
Free Cash Flow
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$1.4M
Q4 25
$20.9M
$13.0M
Q3 25
$21.5M
$16.3M
Q2 25
$14.8M
$-30.4M
Q1 25
$7.2M
$-21.2M
Q4 24
$36.1M
$-22.3M
Q3 24
$24.3M
$-8.9M
Q2 24
$21.6M
$-15.4M
FCF Margin
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
0.7%
Q4 25
10.3%
8.6%
Q3 25
10.9%
13.8%
Q2 25
7.4%
-29.6%
Q1 25
3.7%
-27.1%
Q4 24
18.0%
-33.5%
Q3 24
11.7%
-18.6%
Q2 24
10.5%
-37.8%
Capex Intensity
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
0.1%
Q4 25
0.8%
4.2%
Q3 25
0.7%
1.6%
Q2 25
0.5%
1.0%
Q1 25
1.1%
0.8%
Q4 24
1.2%
0.1%
Q3 24
0.6%
0.6%
Q2 24
0.7%
2.5%
Cash Conversion
FET
FET
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
0.36×
Q4 25
10.83×
Q3 25
Q2 25
2.05×
Q1 25
8.31×
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FET
FET

Drilling and Completions$126.7M61%
Downhole$50.6M24%
Production Equipment$18.8M9%
Valve Solutions$12.8M6%

TARS
TARS

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons