vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FARADAY FUTURE INTELLIGENT ELECTRIC INC. (FFAI) and Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vir Biotechnology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($240.0K vs $129.0K, roughly 1.9× FARADAY FUTURE INTELLIGENT ELECTRIC INC.). FARADAY FUTURE INTELLIGENT ELECTRIC INC. runs the higher net margin — -26011.6% vs -67975.4%, a 41963.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FARADAY FUTURE INTELLIGENT ELECTRIC INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-45.1% vs -89.9%). FARADAY FUTURE INTELLIGENT ELECTRIC INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-29.5M vs $-167.9M).
Faraday Future Inc. is an American technology company founded in 2014 focused on the development of electric vehicles. Based in Los Angeles, California, it began producing vehicles in 2023 and markets them in the United States and China. The company delivered a total of 16 vehicles by January 2025. After two funding rounds in late 2024 totaling $60 million, the company announced it will pivot to selling rebadged Chinese vans.
Vir Biotechnology, Inc. is a clinical-stage immunology company focused on developing innovative therapies and vaccines to address serious infectious diseases including COVID-19, hepatitis B, HIV, and influenza. It operates primarily in the global biopharmaceutical market, collaborating with leading industry partners to advance its pipeline of targeted immune-based solutions for patient populations worldwide.
FFAI vs VIR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $129.0K | $240.0K |
| Net Profit | $-33.6M | $-163.1M |
| Gross Margin | -12111.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -25041.9% | -72267.9% |
| Net Margin | -26011.6% | -67975.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -45.1% | -89.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 72.3% | 23.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.17 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $129.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $240.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $316.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.0K | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $293.0K | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $56.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-33.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-163.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-111.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-121.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-213.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-108.7M | $-138.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-65.3M |
| Q4 25 | -12111.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 99.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6666.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8801.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 97.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7057.0% | 98.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 99.9% |
| Q4 25 | -25041.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -72267.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9754.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13870.6% | -4602.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12899.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9718.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17272.7% | -5158.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -142.0% |
| Q4 25 | -26011.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -67975.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9139.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3252.5% | -3989.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -51599.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8979.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -37093.9% | -4500.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -115.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.88 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.9M | $497.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-27.3M | $796.1M |
| Total Assets | $277.9M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $497.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $598.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5M | $790.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $901.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $909.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $793.0K | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $-27.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $796.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $947.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $277.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $410.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $425.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $457.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-28.4M | $-167.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-29.5M | $-167.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22886.8% | -69952.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 867.4% | 132.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-91.3M | $-824.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-28.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-167.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-120.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.3M | $-78.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $-446.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-171.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.4M | $-77.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-109.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-29.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-167.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-122.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.9M | $-79.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.3M | $-453.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-174.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.6M | $-78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-111.3M |
| Q4 25 | -22886.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -69952.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10111.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6918.7% | -2630.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10770.6% | -3666.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7321.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4993.5% | -2553.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -197.4% |
| Q4 25 | 867.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 132.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 209.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 496.2% | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2945.1% | 59.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 116.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 88.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
