vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of First Foundation Inc. (FFWM) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
First Foundation Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($48.4M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.2× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs -97.9%, a 152.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, First Foundation Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (421.7% vs 1.1%). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-35.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC's revenue compounded faster (14.1% CAGR vs -2.7%).
John B. Lacson Colleges Foundation (Bacolod), Inc. is a private maritime college in Bacolod, Negros Occidental, Philippines.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
FFWM vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $48.4M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $-8.0M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -97.5% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | -97.9% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 421.7% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 43.0% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $48.4M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.6M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.4M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.4M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.5M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.1M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-146.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.7M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.1M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-82.2M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $793.0K | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | -97.5% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -92.7% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.1% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -247.7% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1276.7% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | -97.9% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -230.1% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.0% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.2% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -896.9% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.78 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.24 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.23 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $912.6M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $912.6M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $917.9M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $933.2M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $928.7M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $11.9B | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.6B | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6B | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.6B | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.4B | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7B | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6B | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-31.9M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-35.2M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -72.8% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-45.9M | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-31.9M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.2M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.3M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-552.0K | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.7M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-35.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.7M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.4M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | -72.8% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -32.4% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -123.5% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 146.2% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.6% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.4% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.08× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.96× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.09× | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FFWM
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
