vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FGI Industries Ltd. (FGI) and Zevia PBC (ZVIA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zevia PBC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($37.9M vs $30.5M, roughly 1.2× FGI Industries Ltd.). Zevia PBC runs the higher net margin — -3.4% vs -8.6%, a 5.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zevia PBC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.0% vs -14.4%). Over the past eight quarters, FGI Industries Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.5% CAGR vs -1.2%).
FGI Industries Ltd is a global designer, manufacturer and distributor of kitchen and bath products, home organization solutions, and home improvement goods. It serves major retail chains, home specialty stores and e-commerce platforms across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
Zevia is a Los Angeles based company that produces soft drinks, organic tea, energy drinks, and mixers sweetened with stevia. All Zevia products are zero-calorie, sugar-free, gluten free, vegan, certified kosher, and certified by The Non-GMO Project. In June 2021, Zevia filed to go public with an IPO.
FGI vs ZVIA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.5M | $37.9M |
| Net Profit | $-2.6M | $-1.3M |
| Gross Margin | 26.7% | 47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | -4.0% |
| Net Margin | -8.6% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.4% | -4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -553.1% | 80.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.63 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.5M | $37.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.2M | $38.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.6M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | $36.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.4M | $40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.8M | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $-651.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-629.1K | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-402.3K | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-550.1K | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.6K | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-412.2K | $-7.2M |
| Q4 25 | 26.7% | 47.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.1% | 48.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.8% | 50.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | 49.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.4% | 45.7% |
| Q4 25 | -2.2% | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.7% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.9% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.5% | -16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.2% | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.5% | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.0% | -18.8% |
| Q4 25 | -8.6% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.6% | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.0% | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.5% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | -17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.3% | -18.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.63 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.86 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.64 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.38 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.29 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9M | $25.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $17.3M | $51.0M |
| Total Assets | $69.5M | $63.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $17.3M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.8M | $53.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $64.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.5M | $72.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $75.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.9M | $80.3M |
| Q4 25 | $69.5M | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.0M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.7M | $62.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.5M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.5M | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.7M | $72.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.9M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.6M | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.3M | $-507.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-212.5K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | $-507.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.9M | $116.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.4M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $617.4K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-915.0K | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $862.1K | $282.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.0M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-214.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $281.5K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.27× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FGI
| Sanitaryware | $19.1M | 63% |
| Shower System | $5.8M | 19% |
| Kitchen And Bath Other | $3.3M | 11% |
| Bath Furniture Products | $2.3M | 7% |
ZVIA
Segment breakdown not available.
