vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST HAWAIIAN, INC. (FHB) and SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP (SXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($435.8M vs $220.3M, roughly 2.0× FIRST HAWAIIAN, INC.). FIRST HAWAIIAN, INC. runs the higher net margin — 30.8% vs 10.1%, a 20.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP's revenue compounded faster (3.9% CAGR vs 3.8%).
First Hawaiian, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaiʻi. Its principal subsidiary, First Hawaiian Bank, founded in 1858, is Hawaiʻi’s oldest and largest financial institution headquartered in Honolulu at the First Hawaiian Center. The bank has 57 branches throughout Hawaiʻi, three in Guam and one in Saipan. It offers banking services to consumer and commercial customers, including deposit products, lending services and wealth management, insurance, private banking an...
Sensient Technologies is a global manufacturer and marketer of colors, flavors and fragrances based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Their products are used in many foods and beverages, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, home and personal care products, specialty printing and imaging products, computer imaging and industrial colors. Sensient reported revenue of $1,468 million in 2013. Subdivisions include the Sensient Flavors & Fragrances Group and the Sensient Color Group. Within the Flavors & Fragrances G...
FHB vs SXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $220.3M | $435.8M |
| Net Profit | $67.8M | $44.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 15.3% |
| Net Margin | 30.8% | 10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.4% | 28.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $220.3M | $435.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $225.9M | $393.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $226.4M | $412.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $217.5M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.0M | $392.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.1M | $376.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $210.0M | $392.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $204.6M | $403.5M |
| Q1 26 | $67.8M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $69.9M | $25.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.2M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.2M | $34.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.5M | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.9M | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.5% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.4% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 12.3% |
| Q1 26 | 30.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.3% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.59 | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.41 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.48 | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $38.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | $767.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.8B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $24.3B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.3M |
| Q1 26 | $0 | $767.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $709.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $613.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $24.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | 0.00× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FHB
| Net Interest Income | $167.5M | 76% |
| Noninterest Income | $52.8M | 24% |
SXT
Segment breakdown not available.