vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FEDERATED HERMES, INC. (FHI) and Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

FEDERATED HERMES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($479.0M vs $403.4M, roughly 1.2× Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.). FEDERATED HERMES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 20.1% vs 2.0%, a 18.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs -0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, FEDERATED HERMES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (9.1% CAGR vs -3.1%).

Federated Hermes is an investment manager headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Founded in 1955 and incorporated on October 18, 1957, the company manages $902.6 billion of customer assets, as of December 2025. The company offers investments spanning equity, fixed-income, alternative/private markets, multi-asset and liquidity management strategies, including mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), separate accounts, closed-end funds and collective investment funds. Clie...

Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. is an American sports holding company based in New York City.

FHI vs MSGS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FHI
FHI
1.2× larger
FHI
$479.0M
$403.4M
MSGS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MSGS
MSGS
+13.6% gap
MSGS
12.8%
-0.8%
FHI
Higher net margin
FHI
FHI
18.1% more per $
FHI
20.1%
2.0%
MSGS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FHI
FHI
Annualised
FHI
9.1%
-3.1%
MSGS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Revenue
$479.0M
$403.4M
Net Profit
$96.4M
$8.2M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
26.4%
5.5%
Net Margin
20.1%
2.0%
Revenue YoY
-0.8%
12.8%
Net Profit YoY
641.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.34

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$479.0M
Q4 25
$482.8M
$403.4M
Q3 25
$469.4M
$39.5M
Q2 25
$424.8M
$204.0M
Q1 25
$423.5M
$424.2M
Q4 24
$424.7M
$357.8M
Q3 24
$408.5M
$53.3M
Q2 24
$402.6M
$227.3M
Net Profit
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$96.4M
Q4 25
$107.0M
$8.2M
Q3 25
$104.1M
$-8.8M
Q2 25
$91.0M
$-1.8M
Q1 25
$101.1M
$-14.2M
Q4 24
$84.7M
$1.1M
Q3 24
$87.5M
$-7.5M
Q2 24
$21.0M
$25.5M
Operating Margin
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
26.4%
Q4 25
28.1%
5.5%
Q3 25
27.6%
-69.5%
Q2 25
27.6%
-11.1%
Q1 25
31.1%
7.6%
Q4 24
26.0%
3.7%
Q3 24
27.4%
-15.5%
Q2 24
10.1%
23.0%
Net Margin
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
20.1%
Q4 25
22.2%
2.0%
Q3 25
22.2%
-22.3%
Q2 25
21.4%
-0.9%
Q1 25
23.9%
-3.4%
Q4 24
19.9%
0.3%
Q3 24
21.4%
-14.1%
Q2 24
5.2%
11.2%
EPS (diluted)
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.38
$0.34
Q3 25
$1.34
$-0.37
Q2 25
$1.16
$-0.08
Q1 25
$1.25
$-0.59
Q4 24
$1.08
$0.05
Q3 24
$1.06
$-0.31
Q2 24
$0.20
$1.07

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$81.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$348.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$100.8B
$-282.1M
Total Assets
$2.1B
$1.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$582.5M
$81.3M
Q3 25
$506.3M
$48.6M
Q2 25
$371.0M
$144.6M
Q1 25
$387.6M
$96.5M
Q4 24
$504.4M
$107.8M
Q3 24
$375.0M
$52.3M
Q2 24
$307.4M
$89.1M
Total Debt
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$348.4M
Q4 25
$348.4M
Q3 25
$348.3M
Q2 25
$348.2M
Q1 25
$348.2M
Q4 24
$348.1M
Q3 24
$348.0M
Q2 24
$348.0M
Stockholders' Equity
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$100.8B
Q4 25
$1.2B
$-282.1M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$-294.2M
Q2 25
$1.1B
$-281.4M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$-283.4M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$-273.1M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$-277.5M
Q2 24
$1.0B
$-266.3M
Total Assets
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$2.2B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$2.2B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$2.2B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$2.0B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$2.1B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$2.0B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.9B
$1.3B
Debt / Equity
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
0.00×
Q4 25
0.29×
Q3 25
0.29×
Q2 25
0.31×
Q1 25
0.32×
Q4 24
0.32×
Q3 24
0.32×
Q2 24
0.34×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$32.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$31.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
7.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.94×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-480.0K

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$297.3M
$32.4M
Q3 25
$103.1M
$-85.0M
Q2 25
$18.8M
$49.7M
Q1 25
$14.3M
$6.3M
Q4 24
$346.6M
$61.8M
Q3 24
$117.1M
$-26.2M
Q2 24
$88.7M
$108.4M
Free Cash Flow
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$294.6M
$31.6M
Q3 25
$101.6M
$-85.3M
Q2 25
$18.0M
$49.4M
Q1 25
$13.3M
$3.9M
Q4 24
$342.5M
$61.2M
Q3 24
$114.1M
$-26.5M
Q2 24
$82.7M
$108.0M
FCF Margin
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
61.0%
7.8%
Q3 25
21.6%
-216.3%
Q2 25
4.2%
24.2%
Q1 25
3.1%
0.9%
Q4 24
80.7%
17.1%
Q3 24
27.9%
-49.7%
Q2 24
20.5%
47.5%
Capex Intensity
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.6%
0.2%
Q3 25
0.3%
0.9%
Q2 25
0.2%
0.2%
Q1 25
0.2%
0.6%
Q4 24
0.9%
0.1%
Q3 24
0.7%
0.7%
Q2 24
1.5%
0.2%
Cash Conversion
FHI
FHI
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.78×
3.94×
Q3 25
0.99×
Q2 25
0.21×
Q1 25
0.14×
Q4 24
4.09×
55.61×
Q3 24
1.34×
Q2 24
4.22×
4.25×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FHI
FHI

Investment advisory fees, net$319.4M67%
Administrative service fees, net-affiliates$110.3M23%
Other$49.3M10%

MSGS
MSGS

Event Related$167.2M41%
Media Rights$122.3M30%
Sponsorship Signage And Suite Licenses$98.5M24%
League Distribution$15.4M4%

Related Comparisons