vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FEDERATED HERMES, INC. (FHI) and OGE ENERGY CORP. (OGE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OGE ENERGY CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($701.7M vs $482.8M, roughly 1.5× FEDERATED HERMES, INC.). FEDERATED HERMES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 22.2% vs 9.9%, a 12.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FEDERATED HERMES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs -5.8%). FEDERATED HERMES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($294.6M vs $83.1M). Over the past eight quarters, FEDERATED HERMES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs 9.7%).
Federated Hermes is an investment manager headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Founded in 1955 and incorporated on October 18, 1957, the company manages $902.6 billion of customer assets, as of December 2025. The company offers investments spanning equity, fixed-income, alternative/private markets, multi-asset and liquidity management strategies, including mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), separate accounts, closed-end funds and collective investment funds. Clie...
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company is a regulated electric utility company that serves over 843,000 customers in Oklahoma and Arkansas, including 1.5 million people in the Oklahoma City Metropolitan Area. It is the leading subsidiary of OGE Energy Corp., with headquarters in downtown Oklahoma City. OGE Energy is also the former parent of Enogex Inc., a natural gas pipeline business which merged with CenterPoint Energy's midstream business to form Enable Midstream in 2013, in 2021 OGE and CenterP...
FHI vs OGE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $482.8M | $701.7M |
| Net Profit | $107.0M | $69.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 59.2% |
| Operating Margin | 28.1% | 19.7% |
| Net Margin | 22.2% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.7% | -5.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.4% | -32.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.38 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $482.8M | $701.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $469.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.8M | $719.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $423.5M | $741.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $424.7M | $744.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $408.5M | $945.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.6M | $644.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $396.4M | $582.6M |
| Q4 25 | $107.0M | $69.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.1M | $231.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.0M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.1M | $62.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.7M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.5M | $218.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $102.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.0M | $18.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 59.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 62.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 63.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 60.1% |
| Q4 25 | 28.1% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.6% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.1% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.0% | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 27.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.4% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.9% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.38 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.34 | $1.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.16 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.25 | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.08 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $1.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | $0.51 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $582.5M | $200.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $348.4M | $5.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $14.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.29× | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $582.5M | $200.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.3M | $300.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $371.0M | $500.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $387.6M | $26.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $504.4M | $600.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $375.0M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $307.4M | $100.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $359.8M | $4.3M |
| Q4 25 | $348.4M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $348.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $348.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $348.1M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $348.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $347.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $14.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $14.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $14.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $14.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $12.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.29× | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.30× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $297.3M | $384.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $294.6M | $83.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 61.0% | 11.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 43.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.78× | 5.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $427.5M | $82.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $297.3M | $384.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.1M | $397.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $338.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $346.6M | $129.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.1M | $347.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $253.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $83.0M |
| Q4 25 | $294.6M | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.6M | $168.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0M | $64.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $-233.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $342.5M | $-167.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.1M | $103.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.7M | $-70.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5M | $-143.9M |
| Q4 25 | 61.0% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.6% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | -31.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.7% | -22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -10.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | -24.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 43.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 38.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 39.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 38.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.78× | 5.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.21× | 3.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.14× | 0.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.09× | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | 1.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.22× | 2.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.19× | 4.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FHI
| Investment Advisory Management And Administrative Service | $314.0M | 65% |
| Separateaccounts | $63.9M | 13% |
| Other | $61.2M | 13% |
| Distribution Service | $43.7M | 9% |
OGE
| Residential | $238.0M | 34% |
| Commercial | $216.6M | 31% |
| Public Authority | $60.7M | 9% |
| Industrial | $59.6M | 8% |
| Oilfield | $56.6M | 8% |
| Transmission | $38.7M | 6% |
| Integrated Market | $20.4M | 3% |
| Other Contractswith Customers | $11.1M | 2% |
