vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST HORIZON CORP (FHN) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $888.0M, roughly 1.2× FIRST HORIZON CORP). FIRST HORIZON CORP runs the higher net margin — 29.4% vs 5.0%, a 24.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST HORIZON CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.8% vs -2.5%). FIRST HORIZON CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($389.0M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, FIRST HORIZON CORP's revenue compounded faster (20.0% CAGR vs 6.6%).

First Horizon Corporation, formerly First Tennessee Bank, is a financial services company, founded in 1864, and based in Memphis, Tennessee. Through its banking subsidiary First Horizon Bank, it provides financial services through locations in 12 states across the Southeast, a region in which it is the fourth largest regional bank.

Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.

FHN vs GTLS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GTLS
GTLS
1.2× larger
GTLS
$1.1B
$888.0M
FHN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FHN
FHN
+24.3% gap
FHN
21.8%
-2.5%
GTLS
Higher net margin
FHN
FHN
24.4% more per $
FHN
29.4%
5.0%
GTLS
More free cash flow
FHN
FHN
$322.8M more FCF
FHN
$389.0M
$66.2M
GTLS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FHN
FHN
Annualised
FHN
20.0%
6.6%
GTLS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Revenue
$888.0M
$1.1B
Net Profit
$261.0M
$53.6M
Gross Margin
33.3%
Operating Margin
38.5%
11.6%
Net Margin
29.4%
5.0%
Revenue YoY
21.8%
-2.5%
Net Profit YoY
57.2%
-32.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.51
$1.06

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$888.0M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$889.0M
$1.1B
Q2 25
$830.0M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$812.0M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$729.0M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$827.0M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.0B
Q1 24
$819.0M
$950.7M
Net Profit
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$261.0M
$53.6M
Q3 25
$262.0M
$-138.5M
Q2 25
$241.0M
$76.1M
Q1 25
$218.0M
$49.5M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$79.6M
Q3 24
$218.0M
$69.0M
Q2 24
$58.6M
Q1 24
$192.0M
$11.3M
Gross Margin
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
33.3%
Q3 25
34.1%
Q2 25
33.6%
Q1 25
33.9%
Q4 24
33.6%
Q3 24
34.1%
Q2 24
33.8%
Q1 24
31.8%
Operating Margin
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
38.5%
11.6%
Q3 25
38.7%
-8.0%
Q2 25
37.2%
15.7%
Q1 25
35.1%
15.2%
Q4 24
28.8%
17.0%
Q3 24
34.0%
16.8%
Q2 24
16.1%
Q1 24
31.0%
11.9%
Net Margin
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
29.4%
5.0%
Q3 25
29.5%
-12.6%
Q2 25
29.0%
7.0%
Q1 25
26.8%
4.9%
Q4 24
22.8%
7.2%
Q3 24
26.4%
6.5%
Q2 24
5.6%
Q1 24
23.4%
1.2%
EPS (diluted)
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$0.51
$1.06
Q3 25
$0.50
$-3.23
Q2 25
$0.45
$1.53
Q1 25
$0.41
$0.94
Q4 24
$0.29
$1.57
Q3 24
$0.40
$1.33
Q2 24
$1.10
Q1 24
$0.33
$0.10

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$366.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$8.8B
$3.2B
Total Assets
$83.9B
$9.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.13×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$366.0M
Q3 25
$399.2M
Q2 25
$342.3M
Q1 25
$296.2M
Q4 24
$308.6M
Q3 24
$310.2M
Q2 24
$247.4M
Q1 24
$191.9M
Total Debt
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$3.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$3.8B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$8.8B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$8.9B
$3.2B
Q2 25
$9.0B
$3.4B
Q1 25
$8.7B
$3.0B
Q4 24
$8.8B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$9.0B
$3.0B
Q2 24
$2.7B
Q1 24
$8.9B
$2.7B
Total Assets
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$83.9B
$9.8B
Q3 25
$83.2B
$9.8B
Q2 25
$82.1B
$9.7B
Q1 25
$81.5B
$9.3B
Q4 24
$82.2B
$9.1B
Q3 24
$82.6B
$9.5B
Q2 24
$9.3B
Q1 24
$81.8B
$9.2B
Debt / Equity
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
1.13×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.33×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$396.0M
$88.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$389.0M
$66.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
43.8%
6.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.8%
2.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.52×
1.66×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$595.0M
$202.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$396.0M
$88.8M
Q3 25
$-200.0M
$118.0M
Q2 25
$83.0M
$145.9M
Q1 25
$349.0M
$-60.0M
Q4 24
$191.0M
$281.4M
Q3 24
$389.0M
$200.6M
Q2 24
$116.1M
Q1 24
$838.0M
$-95.1M
Free Cash Flow
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$389.0M
$66.2M
Q3 25
$-208.0M
$94.7M
Q2 25
$74.0M
$122.0M
Q1 25
$340.0M
$-80.1M
Q4 24
$174.0M
$260.9M
Q3 24
$383.0M
$174.5M
Q2 24
$88.0M
Q1 24
$828.0M
$-141.2M
FCF Margin
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
43.8%
6.1%
Q3 25
-23.4%
8.6%
Q2 25
8.9%
11.3%
Q1 25
41.9%
-8.0%
Q4 24
23.9%
23.6%
Q3 24
46.3%
16.4%
Q2 24
8.5%
Q1 24
101.1%
-14.9%
Capex Intensity
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
0.8%
2.1%
Q3 25
0.9%
2.1%
Q2 25
1.1%
2.2%
Q1 25
1.1%
2.0%
Q4 24
2.3%
1.9%
Q3 24
0.7%
2.5%
Q2 24
2.7%
Q1 24
1.2%
4.8%
Cash Conversion
FHN
FHN
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
1.52×
1.66×
Q3 25
-0.76×
Q2 25
0.34×
1.92×
Q1 25
1.60×
-1.21×
Q4 24
1.15×
3.54×
Q3 24
1.78×
2.91×
Q2 24
1.98×
Q1 24
4.36×
-8.42×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FHN
FHN

Commercial Consumer And Wealth Segment$776.0M87%
Other$88.0M10%
Corporate$24.0M3%

GTLS
GTLS

Repair Service And Leasing Segment$330.4M31%
Heat Transfer Systems Segment$325.8M30%
Specialty Products Segment$259.5M24%
Transferred Over Time$94.4M9%
Transferred At Point In Time$69.5M6%

Related Comparisons