vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST HORIZON CORP (FHN) and Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FIRST HORIZON CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($888.0M vs $509.0M, roughly 1.7× Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.). FIRST HORIZON CORP runs the higher net margin — 29.4% vs -120.7%, a 150.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST HORIZON CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.8% vs -54.7%). FIRST HORIZON CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($389.0M vs $-322.3M).
First Horizon Corporation, formerly First Tennessee Bank, is a financial services company, founded in 1864, and based in Memphis, Tennessee. Through its banking subsidiary First Horizon Bank, it provides financial services through locations in 12 states across the Southeast, a region in which it is the fourth largest regional bank.
Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. is a Singapore-based company that designs and manufactures photovoltaic panels. The company was previously a division of the American company SunPower. Maxeon was spun off from SunPower in August 2020. Maxeon was the primary provider of solar panels for SunPower through March 2024. Beyond the United States, Maxeon has sales operations in more than 100 countries and has the rights to use the SunPower brand in countries outside the United States.
FHN vs MAXN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $888.0M | $509.0M |
| Net Profit | $261.0M | $-614.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 38.5% | -113.3% |
| Net Margin | 29.4% | -120.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.8% | -54.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.2% | -122.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.51 | $-96.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $888.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $830.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $812.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $729.0M | $509.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $819.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $617.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $261.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $241.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $218.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | $-614.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $218.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $184.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.8% | -113.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 28.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | -120.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 29.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $-96.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.32 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $28.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.8B | $-293.8M |
| Total Assets | $83.9B | $376.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $-293.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $9.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $83.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.2B | $376.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.8B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $81.7B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $396.0M | $-270.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $389.0M | $-322.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 43.8% | -63.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 10.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.52× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $595.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $396.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-200.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $349.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $191.0M | $-270.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $838.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $365.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $389.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-208.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $74.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $340.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $174.0M | $-322.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $383.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $828.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.9% | -63.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 101.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.76× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.36× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 1.98× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FHN
| Commercial Consumer And Wealth Segment | $776.0M | 87% |
| Other | $88.0M | 10% |
| Corporate | $24.0M | 3% |
MAXN
Segment breakdown not available.