vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. (FHTX) and Solana Co (HSDT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.2M vs $5.2M, roughly 1.8× Solana Co). Solana Co runs the higher net margin — 6227.1% vs -234.3%, a 6461.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Solana Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2725.9% vs 223.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Solana Co's revenue compounded faster (522.3% CAGR vs 35.3%).
Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company dedicated to developing novel therapies targeting the chromatin regulatory system to treat various types of cancer and other severe diseases. It advances a diverse pipeline of targeted drug candidates, conducting internal R&D and strategic partnerships to serve global patient populations.
Solana is a Mexican cottage manufacturer of sports, racing, and kids' automobiles based in Mexico City. The family run company has operated since 1936, with a total production of fewer than fifty cars; the majority of them one-offs. The family is heavily involved in motor sports; the most prominent member was Moisés Solana, who raced family-built cars and later in Formula One.
FHTX vs HSDT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.2M | $5.2M |
| Net Profit | $-21.7M | $325.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 96.6% |
| Operating Margin | -258.2% | -3845.8% |
| Net Margin | -234.3% | 6227.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 223.8% | 2725.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -11.1% | 8388.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $111.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2M | $697.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6M | $43.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $49.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $185.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $51.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | $182.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $135.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-21.7M | $325.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.8M | $-352.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.9M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.8M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.1M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.0M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-25.0M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 96.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 85.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | -258.2% | -3845.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -226.9% | -5086.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -279.2% | -7725.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -385.0% | -8185.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -840.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -305.5% | -7980.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -386.6% | -1796.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -558.3% | -2530.4% |
| Q4 25 | -234.3% | 6227.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -194.4% | -50612.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -237.3% | -22867.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -316.4% | -7832.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -682.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -244.9% | -7227.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -333.6% | -885.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -495.4% | -1863.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $111.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.25 | $-32.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | $-79.73 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.30 | $-0.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.31 | $-744.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.45 | $-485.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.59 | $-3.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $80.9M | $7.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-108.5M | $300.9M |
| Total Assets | $198.1M | $303.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.9M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.3M | $124.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.6M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.5M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.9M | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.3M | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-108.5M | $300.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-89.7M | $-152.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-76.7M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-61.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-45.5M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.3M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.3M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-97.5M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $198.1M | $303.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.0M | $475.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.7M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $284.0M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $308.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $328.6M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $255.0M | $5.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-22.3M | $-16.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.05× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-22.3M | $-16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.9M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.0M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.5M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.0M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.5M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.3M | $-3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.0M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.4M | $-3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -278.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -403.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -875.3% | -5970.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -273.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -371.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -583.1% | -2226.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
