vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC (FIBK) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($313.0M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.2× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 34.8% vs 0.7%, a 34.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.8% vs -16.5%).
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. is a financial holding company headquartered in Billings, Montana. It is the parent company of First Interstate Bank, a community bank with locations throughout 14 states within the Western and Midwestern United States. It is the largest bank based in Montana, as measured by total assets.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
FIBK vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $313.0M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $108.8M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 44.5% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 34.8% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.8% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 108.8% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $313.0M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.3M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $247.0M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $251.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $244.3M | $305.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $242.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $108.8M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.7M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 44.5% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.07 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.69 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.57 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $146.3M | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $26.6B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $802.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $146.3M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $252.0M | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.4M | $82.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $370.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $740.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $26.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.12× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.12× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $305.6M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.81× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $305.6M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.1M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.5M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.3M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.56× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.50× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
