vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC (FIBK) and Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($313.0M vs $251.2M, roughly 1.2× Orla Mining Ltd.).
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. is a financial holding company headquartered in Billings, Montana. It is the parent company of First Interstate Bank, a community bank with locations throughout 14 states within the Western and Midwestern United States. It is the largest bank based in Montana, as measured by total assets.
Orla Mining Ltd. is a Canada-based mineral exploration and development firm focused on high-grade gold and precious metal assets in North and Central America, with core projects in Mexico and Nevada, U.S. It follows sustainable responsible mining practices, collaborates with local communities, and delivers long-term value to stakeholders.
FIBK vs ORLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $313.0M | $251.2M |
| Net Profit | $108.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 44.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 34.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 19.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 108.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $313.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.5M | $251.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.3M | $151.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $247.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $251.9M | $584.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $244.3M | $110.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $242.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $108.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.5M | $-368.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 44.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | -63.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.57 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $146.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.4B | $507.4M |
| Total Assets | $26.6B | $598.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $96.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $146.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $252.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $370.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $507.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $507.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $968.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $400.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $26.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3B | $598.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.6B | $598.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.3B | $535.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.12× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $305.6M | $126.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.81× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $305.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.7M | $126.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.1M | $74.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.9M | $92.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.3M | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.50× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
