vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figma, Inc. (FIG) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Figma, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($274.2M vs $187.0M, roughly 1.5× National Storage Affiliates Trust). National Storage Affiliates Trust runs the higher net margin — 12.2% vs -400.1%, a 412.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Figma, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.0% vs -1.6%). National Storage Affiliates Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($299.8M vs $49.5M).
Figma is a collaborative web application for interface design, with additional offline features enabled by desktop applications for macOS and Windows. The feature set of Figma focuses on user interface and user experience design, with an emphasis on real-time collaboration, utilizing a variety of vector graphics editor and prototyping tools. The Figma mobile app for Android and iOS allows viewing and interacting with Figma prototypes in real-time on mobile and tablet devices.
National Storage Affiliates Trust is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on self-storage assets. It owns, operates and acquires self-storage facilities across dozens of U.S. states, offering secure storage solutions for residential and commercial customers.
FIG vs NSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $274.2M | $187.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.1B | $22.9M |
| Gross Margin | 69.4% | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | -414.6% | 20.2% |
| Net Margin | -400.1% | 12.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 38.0% | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6933.0% | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.72 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $187.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.2M | $188.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $249.6M | $188.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $188.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $190.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $198.6M | $193.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.2M | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1B | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-827.9M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.4% | 70.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 88.8% | 70.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.6% | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.7% | 72.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -414.6% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.8% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -504.7% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -400.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -467.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.72 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.39 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $23.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $946.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $50.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $416.1M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $586.1M | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $946.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $973.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $986.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $862.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $51.2M | $338.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $49.5M | $299.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.0% | 160.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 20.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 14.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $541.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $338.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | $100.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $79.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $85.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $363.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $105.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $299.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.5M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $79.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $344.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $101.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $79.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $88.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 160.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 42.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 181.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIG
| Non Us | $147.4M | 54% |
| US | $126.8M | 46% |
NSA
Segment breakdown not available.
