vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($156.4M vs $143.5M, roughly 1.1× FTAI Infrastructure Inc.). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs -68.1%, a 125.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. owns, operates and invests in high-quality critical infrastructure assets across core sectors including transportation logistics, midstream energy, and power generation. It primarily serves North American markets, focusing on assets with stable long-term cash flows, contracted revenue streams, and strong market positions to deliver sustainable returns for stakeholders.
FIGR vs FIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $143.5M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $-97.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | -45.7% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | -68.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 77.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 21.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $-1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | $140.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $122.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $80.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $84.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $82.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-97.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $-104.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $120.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-124.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-48.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-50.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -45.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | -70.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -56.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 81.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -152.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -51.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -56.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -58.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -68.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | -74.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 125.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -154.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -51.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -56.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -60.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $-1.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $57.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | $3.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $21.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $5.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | 176.99× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $181.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $476.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $202.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $370.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $394.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $402.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 176.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | 20.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.94× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | $-2.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-68.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -47.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 45.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-398.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $-24.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-85.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-17.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-68.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-90.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-87.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-151.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-32.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-16.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -64.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -71.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -157.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -42.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -37.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 45.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 67.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 15.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIGR
Segment breakdown not available.
FIP
| Power Revenues | $45.9M | 32% |
| Rail Revenue | $44.6M | 31% |
| Service Other | $22.8M | 16% |
| Gas Revenues | $15.3M | 11% |
| Roadside Services Revenues | $11.5M | 8% |
| Rapauno | $1.2M | 1% |
