vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and Fastly, Inc. (FSLY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fastly, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($173.0M vs $156.4M, roughly 1.1× Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs -11.9%, a 69.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
Fastly, Inc. is an American company based in San Francisco, which describes itself as a cloud computing company. Fastly provides content delivery network services, image optimization, and load balancing services. Fastly's cloud security services include denial-of-service attack protection, bot mitigation, and a web application firewall.
FIGR vs FSLY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $173.0M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $-20.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 62.5% |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | 23.7% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | -11.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 19.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 47.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $173.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $172.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | $158.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $148.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $144.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $137.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $132.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-20.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $-29.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-39.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-38.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-43.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 62.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 54.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 53.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -26.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -24.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -35.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | -18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -33.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $146.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $977.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $361.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $342.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $321.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $307.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $295.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $308.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $311.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $977.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $929.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $937.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $942.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $957.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $965.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $969.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $981.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | $28.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $4.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 14.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $55.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $28.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $251.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIGR
Segment breakdown not available.
FSLY
| Network Services | $126.2M | 73% |
| Security | $38.8M | 22% |
| Other | $8.0M | 5% |
