vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($156.4M vs $90.6M, roughly 1.7× Fathom Holdings Inc.). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs -7.4%, a 64.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
Fathom Holdings Inc. is a US-based real estate technology and services enterprise. It provides end-to-end solutions for real estate agents, brokers, and consumers, including digital transaction management tools, mortgage services, title insurance, and residential property brokerage services, covering most regional markets across the United States.
FIGR vs FTHM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $90.6M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $-6.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | -5.2% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | -7.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $90.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $121.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $93.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $91.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $89.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $70.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | -3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $5.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | $5.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $37.4M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $78.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $43.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $53.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $83.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $80.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $81.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $75.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $80.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $80.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $78.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | $-20.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-20.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -22.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-29.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-20.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-330.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-947.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-364.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-948.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIGR
Segment breakdown not available.
FTHM
| Real Estate Brokerage | $84.9M | 94% |
| Mortgage Segment | $3.4M | 4% |
| Other | $2.3M | 3% |
